[ QUOTE ]
Drop by your local GM dealer and take a look under the hood of some new trucks.
[/ QUOTE ]
GM also stuck with carburetion up until 1990 on some V8's in the states. The only reason GM will do something is to meet emissions standards (CAFE or otherwise) or save money. If the clutch fan saves GM one penny on every truck they sell, they will stick with it. With trucks not having to meet the same emissions standards as cars, I doubt every MPG is a real concern, or else they'd all be filled from front to rear with synthetic lubes, etc. from the factory. (to my knowledge, the trucks are not)
You'd have to see a cost breakdown between the two setups to know for sure, but electrics require a lot more components (even more with larger CID) than a clutch fan. (a 305 or 350 dual fan setup from GM, like in a Camaro, could be two relays, two temp switches, all additional wiring and connectors for two fans, aux. junction block between battery and fans, fan relay fuse/wiring, fusible links, etc., all unnecesary with a clutch fan)
Besides, you can't cool a tranverse mounted motor (modern FWD) with a clutch fan, and electric fans can allow for a lower hoodline, more radical radiator shapes and placement, and a shorter front end. Arguably, none of these are necessary to consider (or at least apparently none are much of a concern except perhaps nose length) on a truck.