CK5
Register an account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members.

Help me identify which crate motor is in my truck

Chevman88

I don't know what I'm doing
 Premium
Joined
Jan 23, 2014
Posts
432
Reaction score
452
Location
Utah
Originally I was planning on swapping an LQ4 into my 86 blazer, however, funds were redirected into a remodel (I can't complain, I got a theater room out of it). So I decided to freshen up the existing motor and have been finding some interesting things that leads me to believe that it definitely isn't the original motor.

1. The guy I bought it from, while friendly, seems to not have had a clue on this - heater hoses were both connected to an 'in' (radiator and water pump nipple), instead of an 'in' and an 'out' (intake and radiator for ex). He also told me the vacuum actuator controlling the vent door was bad, when all that needed to happen was to reconnect the vacuum line to the vacuum canister. So I don't think he would have done any of this gut work on the motor.

2. Double valve springs, did these ever come factory with double springs?
3. Timing gear instead of chain.
4. Head stamp of 3998993 which is either from a 70's SBC, or a Goodwrench crate motor. Also the inside of it was incredibly clean if it is original or even higher miles (inside of valve cover pulled was spotless, minus my grimy hand print in the middle)
5. Chevy dressings all over (valve covers, think it's these ones - https://www.summitracing.com/parts/pro-141-108/reviews/, valve cover bolts, timing cover, and air cleaner.)
6. Edelbrock Performer RPM intake with 1406 carb.
7. Most importantly, NO LEAKS...AT ALL!! These older two piece rear mains I expect to at least have a little oil on the bottom, but this guy is clean! And there is oil in it, I checked and have consistently good oil psi.
8. Off idle this motor moves my heavy tires pretty well for a "stock" SBC just not into freeway speeds.

My reason for wanting to swap to an LS was performance, mileage, it would be badass, annndd I couldn't get the dang thing over 70mph. However, the more and more I dig into this motor, the more and more I'm starting to want to stick with old school, and the more I'm realizing that it was waaayyy poorly tuned and may just need a deep tune up, including carb rebuild/re-jet. Spark plug I pulled was BLACK (I just did the screws, but jets may need replacing still, will check plugs again), the header gaskets were leaking like a banshee and the exhaust looks like it was welded by a 12 year old who started welding a week ago. So this engine doesn't match the rest of the Blazer in build quality at all...

Pics to help me in my quest!

20180728_160740.jpg

20180728_160955.jpg

20180730_213546.jpg

20180730_213556.jpg

20180730_213625.jpg

20180730_220200.jpg

20180730_220212.jpg

20180730_220239.jpg

20180730_220344.jpg

20180730_220359.jpg
 
Originally I was planning on swapping an LQ4 into my 86 blazer, however, funds were redirected into a remodel (I can't complain, I got a theater room out of it). So I decided to freshen up the existing motor and have been finding some interesting things that leads me to believe that it definitely isn't the original motor.

1. The guy I bought it from, while friendly, seems to not have had a clue on this - heater hoses were both connected to an 'in' (radiator and water pump nipple), instead of an 'in' and an 'out' (intake and radiator for ex). He also told me the vacuum actuator controlling the vent door was bad, when all that needed to happen was to reconnect the vacuum line to the vacuum canister. So I don't think he would have done any of this gut work on the motor.

2. Double valve springs, did these ever come factory with double springs?
3. Timing gear instead of chain.
4. Head stamp of 3998993 which is either from a 70's SBC, or a Goodwrench crate motor. Also the inside of it was incredibly clean if it is original or even higher miles (inside of valve cover pulled was spotless, minus my grimy hand print in the middle)
5. Chevy dressings all over (valve covers, think it's these ones - https://www.summitracing.com/parts/pro-141-108/reviews/, valve cover bolts, timing cover, and air cleaner.)
6. Edelbrock Performer RPM intake with 1406 carb.
7. Most importantly, NO LEAKS...AT ALL!! These older two piece rear mains I expect to at least have a little oil on the bottom, but this guy is clean! And there is oil in it, I checked and have consistently good oil psi.
8. Off idle this motor moves my heavy tires pretty well for a "stock" SBC just not into freeway speeds.

My reason for wanting to swap to an LS was performance, mileage, it would be badass, annndd I couldn't get the dang thing over 70mph. However, the more and more I dig into this motor, the more and more I'm starting to want to stick with old school, and the more I'm realizing that it was waaayyy poorly tuned and may just need a deep tune up, including carb rebuild/re-jet. Spark plug I pulled was BLACK (I just did the screws, but jets may need replacing still, will check plugs again), the header gaskets were leaking like a banshee and the exhaust looks like it was welded by a 12 year old who started welding a week ago. So this engine doesn't match the rest of the Blazer in build quality at all...

Pics to help me in my quest!

View attachment 272399

View attachment 272400

View attachment 272401

View attachment 272402

View attachment 272403

View attachment 272404

View attachment 272405

View attachment 272406

View attachment 272407

View attachment 272408
Definitely looks clean.
Worth the effort to do a good tuning including valve adjustment and check the distributor for proper installation.
 
Definitely looks clean.
Worth the effort to do a good tuning including valve adjustment and check the distributor for proper installation.
Ended up replacing the distributor, there was corrosion all over the contacts and the inside of it looked to have seen better days. Replaced plugs, wires, valve cover gaskets, thermostat, and got the idle adjustment screws set. It runs much much better now.
 
On the passenger side in front of the cylinder head there is a flat spot with some number stampings

See if you can read those
 
No numbers, at least not that I could see/feel.
 
Kinda wondering if you have a factory or rebuilt engine. The orange paint over the water pump and the casting number on the heads doesn’t make me feel warm and fuzzy.

Made in Mexico does scream replacement, and those wouldn’t be 70s heads. They could just be replacement heads, not the entire engine

The gear instead of chain is not GM
 
Kinda wondering if you have a factory or rebuilt engine. The orange paint over the water pump and the casting number on the heads doesn’t make me feel warm and fuzzy.

Made in Mexico does scream replacement, and those wouldn’t be 70s heads. They could just be replacement heads, not the entire engine

The gear instead of chain is not GM
Someone did work to the engine that is for sure.
Does not necessarily mean a bad thing.
If it's tight and dry, could be fine with a little more work.
So with the distributor work and the regular maintenance you did, does it feel good enough that you want to run it?
 
Someone did work to the engine that is for sure.
Does not necessarily mean a bad thing.
If it's tight and dry, could be fine with a little more work.
So with the distributor work and the regular maintenance you did, does it feel good enough that you want to run it?

Yeah, I'm not worried about running it, just wanted to get what I could performance wise. Now I just have all the other things on my list...Hahaha.
 

Latest Posts

Top Bottom