Yup yup.



Nah. Only worth having if you're still into it.
Only way I'll own one again is if I can afford to buy one that is completely zero timed, all the factory flaws fixed, and better than new.
Chances of that...
No, nothing far as extreme as his. Gimme a nicely restomodded one and I'd pimp it every day.
*Assuming I had the money to buy, have built, and drive the beast and I live in a place where I don't have to worry about road salt.
Whish I knew what I was getting myself into before I bought mine.Since the thread is already waaaay OT, I'm gonna go ahead and disagree with that.Anything built in the 90's is still uses 50's technology
I'm referring mostly to the pushrod engine. Not much changed in the design of the engine since the 50's. Seems to me Chevy took a patch work approach. Instead of redesigning a better product they patched on existing old technology.Since the thread is already waaaay OT, I'm gonna go ahead and disagree with that.
If you can call TBI fuel injection. IMO it's a fancy carburetor! Fine in the 80's but should have stayed in the 80's.Most everything in the 90's had electronic fuel injection.
The power trains are hugely different!! The engine has been completely redesigned has crank sensors,distributor less ignition just overall drastically different.I would further say that there's not much difference in overall tech between the 90's and today when it comes to passenger vehicles, other than safety items and built in creature comforts (like nav/entertainment systems). The powertrains are not fundamentally different.
I'm referring mostly to the pushrod engine. Not much changed in the design of the engine since the 50's. Seems to me Chevy took a patch work approach. Instead of redesigning a better product they patched on existing old technology.
If you can call TBI fuel injection. IMO it's a fancy carburetor! Fine in the 80's but should have stayed in the 80's.
The power trains are hugely different!! The engine has been completely redesigned has crank sensors,distributor less ignition just overall drastically different.
Well I think it didn't take as long as you think. I think you have to look at other makers of engines not just the American name V8's. I have no idea why it took GM so long to release a new motor. Maybe they held back maybe unions played a role. I have absolutely no idea.If the gen 1 SBC is such old tech, why did it take almost 50 years for anybody to make something better? Chrysler pretty much copied it as close as they could without getting sued, and still couldnt build something better.
Only now with the LS series engines has the SBC been bested by a V8 style passenger/light truck engine, and I doubt very much that the SBC will go obsolete as quickly as the ford flathead did after 1955... If ever.

BMW, Benz comes to mind I'm sure there are others but I wasn't limiting it to V8's. It's the technology that's important and could be applied to any amount of cyclinders. And for that yes a lot of import 4 cylinders had much of this technology in the early 90's. Pushing 100hp per liter too. The technology was available for GM to use, for whatever reason they chose not to use it. I think the imports didn't get into the truck scence until recently because of perception not because they couldn't build a better V8. If you look at the Toyota Tundra comercials it even backs that up. The one where they drive around picking up the typical hillbilly american dude. The one where they say "just get in trust me." I think it takes a while for a different generation to grow up and accept different concepts. People tend to latch on to one thing and be die hard fans without actually trying anything else. I think this has to do with people not liking change. I call GM cars American "named" cars, a honda accord is more American made then some GM cars.Is there a foreign V8 that would be comparable to the SBC that was used in passenger vehicles and light trucks? Nothing comes to mind for me, but I'm fairly ignorant of most non USA made vehicles.
I agree its half assed. I think when they started making the vortec's is when these new 5.3L/6.0L should have come out IMO.I will agree that the LT1 of the 90's and the 5.0/5.7 vortecs were somewhat a halfassed product. with the LT1 why go through the effort of moving the distributor that is sensitive to moisture, to a location where it is more likely to see moisture? going to coil on plug would have been easy enough, but that was a long time ago when they were designed I'm sure.
We didn't jack it until after he sold his truck not sure it matters but if it does OP please let us know.Holy thread HiJack![]()