CK5
Register an account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members.

Kind of shocks to run

Jacksonk5

Registered Member
Joined
May 5, 2010
Posts
21
Reaction score
0
Location
North Carolina
1979 k5 lifted 4inches. any sugestions on the best shocks for the money. some idiot left stock shocks on mine there extended all the way. ha
 
Makes me think of the "to run shocks or not to run shocks" thread, if it rides like a dump truck due to stiff springs already, I'd just pick up something cheap to keep it from bouncing... but if you have a softer suspension you might notice more of a difference with higher quality shocks such as Bilstein. Either way just make sure the shock length and travel are where you need them.
 
Factory rear shocks of a stock new body style dodge 1500 with leaves ride pretty well. And they are cheap
 
Do you have any idea what brand of springs you have? Somewhere on here there's a list of the different spring manufaturers and their spring rates. You could use that info and look up which ones would be the best for your spring rates on the shock companies' websites. Maybe. If your front springs are soft, Bilstien is good from what I hear. I use Trailmaster SSV twin tubes with my Tuff Country EZ Ride 4" springs because they were on sale. If your front springs are stiff, you could try not running any front shocks. You'll definately need some in the rear though, or you'll bounce up and down five or six times for every bump you hit.
 
Monotube FTW. I have Bilstein 5150's for my Blazer...they're not even that spendy IMO.

Rene
 
You're kidding, right?

No. I've done it and lots of other guys on here have too. Earlier this week there was a thread in the garage about a "shock debate that everyone can enjoy." Several users commented that they didn't run front shocks. I know it sounds dumb, but if your springs don't move, what's the need in a shock (unless the front is getting out of control on the road).
 
No. I've done it and lots of other guys on here have too. Earlier this week there was a thread in the garage about a "shock debate that everyone can enjoy." Several users commented that they didn't run front shocks. I know it sounds dumb, but if your springs don't move, what's the need in a shock (unless the front is getting out of control on the road).

That shock "debate" as you call it was fairly useless.

But is it really a good idea to recommend running no front shocks to someone who is a newbie (ahem, an unknown entity) on this board? That user could have many years of driving and 'wheeling experience but just no web presence, or it could be your average 16 year old armed with nothing but testosterone and a truck...
 
That shock "debate" as you call it was fairly useless.

But is it really a good idea to recommend running no front shocks to someone who is a newbie (ahem, an unknown entity) on this board? That user could have many years of driving and 'wheeling experience but just no web presence, or it could be your average 16 year old armed with nothing but testosterone and a truck...

Duely noted. That's about where I was when I did the no shocks thing. In that case, let me change my answer to, "Get the most expensive shocks you can afford.":D
 
... "Get the most expensive shocks you can afford.":D

That doesn't help anybody either. Are you suggesting that "the most expensive shocks you can afford" are in fact the most appropriate shocks for the application at hand?
 
That doesn't help anybody either. Are you suggesting that "the most expensive shocks you can afford" are in fact the most appropriate shocks for the application at hand?

No dude. I've already told the guy what I ran and gave him some info and a link to help him figure out what he needs. I think that with shocks, the more you spend, the better you get. Now whether your suspension can benefit from the good shocks is dependent on how flexible it is, just like I said earlier.

What shocks would you suggest?
 
What shocks would you suggest?

I've had good luck with ProComp MX6 adjustable shocks.
That was the first generation MX6, though (probably the universal/Superduty version); I'm not sure they make a the new version for a K5.

I've briefly had cheap Autozone Gabriel shocks on the truck - they lasted one trail ride and were shot after that.

I currently have Bilstein 5125 (255/70 valving) on the truck, and I'm not happy with them. Not enough damping, particularly not on the rebound side. That's with soft springs (TC HDs, 3"), a D60 and 35s, and ORD bumper/9.5k winch/2 batteries as extra weight in the front.

I've tried to obtain shocks (Monotubes, 2.2) from Doetsch, but I found that company too difficult to work with; I particularly didn't like their disclaimer statement that they want you to sign.

I'm currently leaning to either go back to ProComp MX6, or get a different Bilstein where I can have the valving changed.

And I don't agree that crawlers don't need shocks. As long as everything is nice and slow, and the dynamics of weight transfer are slow, I'm sure this can work. The moment a truck loses traction and gets to bounce, it'll be another story.
 
and i don't agree that crawlers don't need shocks. As long as everything is nice and slow, and the dynamics of weight transfer are slow, i'm sure this can work. The moment a truck loses traction and gets to bounce, it'll be another story.

x 2
 
I've noticed that most Bilstien shocks for half ton fullsize trucks and Blazers seem to list 255/70 as the spring rates. Is this some generic thing, or is that based on the vehicle's weight?

JMS, when you say the rebound was off, do you mean the Bistiens had too much or too little rebound dampening?
 
Top Bottom