CK5
Register an account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members.

Kind of shocks to run

I've noticed that most Bilstein shocks for half ton fullsize trucks and Blazers seem to list 255/70 as the spring rates. Is this some generic thing, or is that based on the vehicle's weight?

Bilstein 5125 list two valvings: 255/70 for single shock applications, and 170/60 for dual shock applications. 5150 is the same, I believe.

According to the numbers, the shocks in my truck are 255/70 (I actually have no way at this point to verify that). I want more rebound damping; I can make the truck 'lurch' off a 6" rock, and slighly bouncy situations on e.g. an offcamber shelf road can become quite interesting. Also, straight climbs with even just a small step in it (like e.g. the LaunchPad on Golden Spike) can lead to a bounce, unload the front suspension, and break traction.

It also seems that the traction bar on the rear axle somehow plays into this 'lurch/launch the front' that I don't like.

BTW, I really liked the set of Bilstein shocks I had on my truck before it got the lift, though. That was a 4000-series shock.
 
So I'm thinking that the 255 is the rating of the compression and the 70 is the rebound? What are those numbers refering to? I guess maybe you need a 255/100 or something. I guess a rebuildable shock could have washers (or whatever you call them) added or subtracted to slow down or speed up the rebound, right? Is that why you want the MX6?
 
I got the MX6 on a recommendation from ORD. They had 5 adjustment positions, I used to run 3/2 (F/R) on the street, and a firmer 5/4 on the trail. I assume the adjustment affected both compression and rebound, but have no numbers for each of the settings.

From what I understand there doesn't seem to be an accepted (standardized) way to compare shock valving properties. I'd like to know how e.g. the Bilstein 255/70 valving would compare to the different settings on a MX6 or a Rancho 9000. Or any other shock, for that matter.

I'm at the point where I've declared the Bilstein 5125 (at least on MY truck, for what I want) a failed $320 (or so) experiment. They were certainly an improvement over my worn-out and well-used MX6s, but not what I want for my truck.
 

Latest Posts

Top Bottom