I have some black MT II's on my 87 k5, and I'm thinking of putting some chrome back on the ol girl. But I cannot decide which I like better. So what do you all think, raceline rockcrusher or MT classic II? Post pics if you got them!
CK5
Register an account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members.
MT classic II or Raceline Rockcrusher
- Thread starter usaf_blazer
- Start date
runamok151
1 ton status
How about trying to paint the ones you have w/ a silver or chrome paint. You'll get the look and save $$.
So these two?
Polished aluminum is better than chrome anyway IMHO. I had M/T CII and was disappointed with how the finish degraded over the years. My experience is that factory wheels have the best clearcoat, although I've never had top dollar aftermarket ones. Both of those wheels are simple and great looking, IMO.
Polished aluminum is better than chrome anyway IMHO. I had M/T CII and was disappointed with how the finish degraded over the years. My experience is that factory wheels have the best clearcoat, although I've never had top dollar aftermarket ones. Both of those wheels are simple and great looking, IMO.
How about having your existing wheels blasted and powdercoated? They can give you almost any finish you want, even similar to polished/chrome: http://www.eastwood.com/hotcoat-powder-single-stage-reflective-chrome.html.
I've thought about having them blasted and coated, but I don't have the faintest clue to how much that would run per wheel. I'm really leaning towards the rockcrushers, they kinda remind me of weld wheels, but a fraction of the cost. Does anyone have any pics of the rockcrushers on a square bodied k5?
I'm all for the classic 2's.
Then again, I'm about to have them on both my trucks. So I'm a bit biased.
Then again, I'm about to have them on both my trucks. So I'm a bit biased.
