bowtiepower00
1/2 ton status
Their are several problems with building a vehicle to use 91, especially a Tow Rig. Octane Creep would probably be the biggest issue, as engines age and carbon builds up, their octane requirements go up several points.
You are going to be using a small camshaft, your cyl pressure is already going to be pretty high, even with lower compression.
If this was a low-load app, then I'd go 10:1 with aluminum, on a app where you are using a large cam, you maybe able to get away with as much as 11:1+, especially with FI, but if anything goes wrong, you're going to have to run 91 mixed with Octane Boost, or try to find 93 or 94 somewhere. With iron, you'll probably want to stay a half point to point lower.
I'd shoot for 87 octane, the power differences, assuming you are able to actually build a motor to take advantage of the higher octane, are going to be minimal. The engine damage that could result is not.
You are going to be using a small camshaft, your cyl pressure is already going to be pretty high, even with lower compression.
If this was a low-load app, then I'd go 10:1 with aluminum, on a app where you are using a large cam, you maybe able to get away with as much as 11:1+, especially with FI, but if anything goes wrong, you're going to have to run 91 mixed with Octane Boost, or try to find 93 or 94 somewhere. With iron, you'll probably want to stay a half point to point lower.
I'd shoot for 87 octane, the power differences, assuming you are able to actually build a motor to take advantage of the higher octane, are going to be minimal. The engine damage that could result is not.

, so now I'm trying to plug in some data to simulate these combos to see not only the PEAK numbers they generate, but how broad and flat the power curves are as well....