Did you read the article? One key he mentions is to not have the drag link horizontal, but rather almost horizontal. Of course, you only have so many choices given the adjustments that are available.
yup. "horizontal" is subjective with this steering design... add a winch to the front of the truck, aaaaaand the drag link angle will change again. put a second battery under the hood... changes... load down the back, aaaaaaaaand changes... as soon as you drive away and the truck is leaning, or accelerating, or braking, i assume there are changes in the drag link angle.
Aside from losing steering range of motion, with my truck, the angles of the drag link were causing binding on the joints as the axle articulated (worse during droop, and even worse when the passenger side is stuffed, and the driver's side droops... if I recall) - I was much more worried about parts breakage and premature wear, than the exact angle of the drag link at static ride height with an unloaded truck. I probably would have settled for some
reverse angle on that drag link if I could have had it, but, with only a few options for limited options for aftermarket steering arms and pitman arms... at some point it just needs to be "better", and not exceed the limits of the joints that are used??
the range of steering with the driver side tire dropped out is terrible with this design, and I'm not sure plus or minus 2-5 degrees of drag link angle at ride height is going to make any noticeable difference.
