CK5
Register an account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members.

Timed or Full Vacuum???

skink4president

Registered Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2005
Posts
79
Reaction score
0
Location
orlando
On my '73 K5 I've used both. Don't have the original Q-jet so I'm not sure if it came stock with both or which was used. Edelbrock calls for "timed" vacuum on emmisions vehicles and full or "manifold" vacuum on non-emissions. The '73 came with emissions (not CA) but all has since been lost. Would I see a performance or mileage difference with one or the other? Right now I'm using timed and running an HEI and Edelbrock Performer square bore.

Thanks!

PS-I did a search of the forum using the above title but nothing came up. If we get some replies to this one maybe it'll provide a hit for others looking for an answer to this question.
 
It shouldn't make for any performance or mileage difference. The only thing it will effect it idle. Mine idles better with it on full vacuum. Try both and use what works best.
 
Top Bottom