I am gathering parts for a customer build, he wants a 5 speed manual.
The options were to obtain a rebuilt NV4500 or get a new TR-4050, customer chose a new TR-4050 because by the time you find and rebuild a NV4500 the cost is pretty close.
I have already purchased a new Tremec TR-4050 (already in possession) through my distributor and ordered a new input gear for an NP205 from NFW. This allows a direct link to the TR4050 without any splined coupler.
I found a round large bearing NP205 I will rebuild for it. Customer wants the 205 simplicity, not the lower gearing of a 208 or 241. I may need a clocking ring, I will find out.
I will start a build thread for the whole project. Will be a 1973 K5 with a 502 BBC, EFI, TR4050, NP205, and 3/4 ton axles.
I am going to document just the TR4050 install here.
I am currently gathering clutch parts. Going with Centerforce on the clutch assembly, 12" if I can fit it, 11" if I can't, because BBC torque.
For the bellhousing. Tremec states the mounting matches the NV4500.
The only bellhousings I can find are Advance Adaptors 712576 or the Quicktime RM-8024.
However, the RM-8024 is made for the smaller transmission bore (5.125"), not the later one (5.600").
So I would have to bore it out. Not sure it is worth it vs the AA model unless it allows needed clutch clearance.
Unless there is a source for a GM 96 and newer NV4500 bellhousing? I'm assuming that's used only?
Another thing is both bell companies say it will only fit a 11" clutch, not a 12", and yet Centerforce says it's the same bolt pattern and will probably fit, especially with the Quicktime unit because its steel and not as thick as the cast aluminum. The depth clearance has to be the only limiter since the pressure plate isn't any wider on the bolt pattern.
My plan is to use a factory internal slave cylinder and not use a fork at all.
Any experience on the bellhousing and clutch clearance before I move forward and make it work?
I read somewhere the mounting bolt pattern changed on the newer NV4500 too, that true? If so maybe the Quicktime bell is not even an option.
The options were to obtain a rebuilt NV4500 or get a new TR-4050, customer chose a new TR-4050 because by the time you find and rebuild a NV4500 the cost is pretty close.
I have already purchased a new Tremec TR-4050 (already in possession) through my distributor and ordered a new input gear for an NP205 from NFW. This allows a direct link to the TR4050 without any splined coupler.
I found a round large bearing NP205 I will rebuild for it. Customer wants the 205 simplicity, not the lower gearing of a 208 or 241. I may need a clocking ring, I will find out.
I will start a build thread for the whole project. Will be a 1973 K5 with a 502 BBC, EFI, TR4050, NP205, and 3/4 ton axles.
I am going to document just the TR4050 install here.
I am currently gathering clutch parts. Going with Centerforce on the clutch assembly, 12" if I can fit it, 11" if I can't, because BBC torque.
For the bellhousing. Tremec states the mounting matches the NV4500.
The only bellhousings I can find are Advance Adaptors 712576 or the Quicktime RM-8024.
However, the RM-8024 is made for the smaller transmission bore (5.125"), not the later one (5.600").
So I would have to bore it out. Not sure it is worth it vs the AA model unless it allows needed clutch clearance.
Unless there is a source for a GM 96 and newer NV4500 bellhousing? I'm assuming that's used only?
Another thing is both bell companies say it will only fit a 11" clutch, not a 12", and yet Centerforce says it's the same bolt pattern and will probably fit, especially with the Quicktime unit because its steel and not as thick as the cast aluminum. The depth clearance has to be the only limiter since the pressure plate isn't any wider on the bolt pattern.
My plan is to use a factory internal slave cylinder and not use a fork at all.
Any experience on the bellhousing and clutch clearance before I move forward and make it work?
I read somewhere the mounting bolt pattern changed on the newer NV4500 too, that true? If so maybe the Quicktime bell is not even an option.
Last edited:


