Ok so I'm thinkin I'm gonna dive right in...
So here's the story, I'm twin sticking my np205 and it's a syncro. @sweetk30 was a sweet guy and shipped out a standard front output shaft l, shift fork and covers etc. So once I got the shift rail in the mail from him I'm laying my rail next to it and they are indexed identical and share the same length.
So the shaft can be modified just the same.
The front output shaft is similar with a spring loaded shift collar. (see picture)
So why couldn't the shift rail be independent? I don't forsee this causing an issue to grenade as a result of a high /low conflict between front and rear bc it operates the same way.
Now one draw back I do see is the possible strength of the front output being weaker as a result of spaller diameter rear cover bearing and the smaller diameter of the coupling gears.
Correct me if I'm wrong but this being a tow rig it would be nice to shift on the fly and I'm not turning 40s so?
So here's the story, I'm twin sticking my np205 and it's a syncro. @sweetk30 was a sweet guy and shipped out a standard front output shaft l, shift fork and covers etc. So once I got the shift rail in the mail from him I'm laying my rail next to it and they are indexed identical and share the same length.
So the shaft can be modified just the same.
The front output shaft is similar with a spring loaded shift collar. (see picture)
So why couldn't the shift rail be independent? I don't forsee this causing an issue to grenade as a result of a high /low conflict between front and rear bc it operates the same way.
Now one draw back I do see is the possible strength of the front output being weaker as a result of spaller diameter rear cover bearing and the smaller diameter of the coupling gears.
Correct me if I'm wrong but this being a tow rig it would be nice to shift on the fly and I'm not turning 40s so?
