Re: Who all\'s injected? Finally got it!
Just had to butt in, noticed this was the newest thread in this forum. /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif
I think the real problem on your trucks and using the stock wiring harness from the donor is that your fuse panel isn't set up to run additional stuff.
On my fuse panel ('86) there are TONS of empty accessory ports on it. With that, some are constant 12V, some are 12V start/run only, some are dimmed with the headlights, etc. On the injection setups, some things need constant 12V, some need run/start 12V only. I can imagine with a glass fuse panel, adding all of these circuits in (I think I have 5 additional on my truck including electric fan fuse) woul be a real hassle, and not "clean" at all.
I don't know how the aftermarket harnesses do it, but the GM EFI stuff originally was hardwired into the fuse panel. So what you end up dealing with is a bunch of cutting and splicing. On my truck, since the accessory ports on the fuse panel are already protected by a 30amp circuit breaker (too much for all the EFI stuff) I got an auxillary fuse panel for about $5, (online) then took whatever I needed off the stock fuse panel (say for ECM, it needs 12V battery) with one wire, ran that to the auxiallary fuse panel, which allows you to fuse that circuit with whatever amperage fuse is required.
This used to be a large problem on the aftermarket harnesses, and that is ganging up circuits on a single fuse, or fewer than stock. For instance, there are two injector fuses for TPI. If you gang the injectors up on one fuse, if you blow the fuse, you have to do double the work to find the problem, right? Same would go with any other "ganged up" circuits.
Not hear to start any arguments, but I don't think cutting and splicing (when done correctly) will have any effect on the system. The GM service manual explicitly shows cutting/splicing to make repairs, and since resistance changes due to wire length, condition, and size, if it was that critical, a shorter (aftermarket) harness would have the same problem as a cut/spliced stock one.
I'm no electrical engineer, but with as many connectors as GM used (both inline and terminal ends) resistance/current flow can't be that big of an issue, at least in my opinion.
It better not be anyways, I had to cut/splice a LOT of wires to get the length right to make it fit the vehicle. /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif I did leave the engine harness pretty much alone, but for all the power feeds, I *had* to change the length (typically add to reach the fuse panel) to make it fit.
Any injected vehicle has VSS, but depending on the year your donor was, it may have been the DRAC setup, or whatever the other one was they used for awhile.
look for the VSS chapter out of their book That will explain VSS to you, and show you the different ones. (formerly) Blazzinor didn't have VSS, then went to VSS, and said he was happy with it, but honestly, some people experience no problems without VSS, while some definitely experience the problems jags that run cite.
If you are installing TPI on an older engine, (as opposed to 87+ heads) you might want to look into one of the '85-86 intake manifolds, I believe whether MAF or MAP the base will work, you just have to get the blockoff stuff for the 9th injector.