82355 1 ton status Premium GMOTM Winner Joined Feb 4, 2009 Posts 17,233 Reaction score 7,864 Location Bradish Nebraska Oct 2, 2012 #21 The Vortec head is better. Martin
dyeager535 1 ton status Premium Joined Dec 13, 2000 Posts 31,571 Solutions 1 Reaction score 2,910 Location Roy, Washington Oct 2, 2012 #22 Why? Looks like EQ makes some http://www.speedtalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=31085
82355 1 ton status Premium GMOTM Winner Joined Feb 4, 2009 Posts 17,233 Reaction score 7,864 Location Bradish Nebraska Oct 2, 2012 #23 Because a flow bench says so, along with the dyno. Martin
dyeager535 1 ton status Premium Joined Dec 13, 2000 Posts 31,571 Solutions 1 Reaction score 2,910 Location Roy, Washington Oct 2, 2012 #24 Have you flowed the EQ's? Are (were) the RHS Vortec replacements worse off as well? From what I'm hearing the current production Vortecs don't flow as well as the older ones either.
Have you flowed the EQ's? Are (were) the RHS Vortec replacements worse off as well? From what I'm hearing the current production Vortecs don't flow as well as the older ones either.
82355 1 ton status Premium GMOTM Winner Joined Feb 4, 2009 Posts 17,233 Reaction score 7,864 Location Bradish Nebraska Oct 2, 2012 #25 The older Vortecs are better. So are a certain casting number of the older Vortecs. You'll have to ask John (80'427), he has the flow bench. Martin
The older Vortecs are better. So are a certain casting number of the older Vortecs. You'll have to ask John (80'427), he has the flow bench. Martin