handloader90
Building!
I've seen a 1008 frame in a truck that had the bed pulled off and they are most definitely beefier than a 1/2 or 3/4 ton truck.
Not sure if it's beefier than a K30 though.
CK5
Register an account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members.
Which truck?
- Thread starter Shawn
- Start date
I've seen a 1008 frame in a truck that had the bed pulled off and they are most definitely beefier than a 1/2 or 3/4 ton truck.
Not sure if it's beefier than a K30 though.
I have a '95 Mazda B3000(Ranger) for my "work" truck and I hate driving it. I'd rather DD my crew cab big block dually C30 or my blazer or my cummins swapped '90 F350 any day over the Mazda. I will NEVER own a front wheel drive car, can't stand them no matter what MPG they get. I will take any truck any day over a car. If I could I would drive a truck on 44s every day. Only car I wouldn't mind would be a G body monte carlo or something that is rear wheel drive and older. Oh and my commute is only 14 miles each way with very little traffic and about an 800 ft gain in elevation and a top speed limit of 55 mph, hence the reason the gutless Mazda sucks. My 6.2L K5 gets 17 mpg with 35s and 4:10 gears. I'd definitely get the 1008 or a late 90s Chevy truck.
I have seriously considered not setting up the 73 C10 for my son but use it for a commuter for me instead. 
Just something I like about driving an older vehicle. I would drive my 66 far more often if I wasn't trying to limit the miles - for both insurance and preservation purposes.
Just something I like about driving an older vehicle. I would drive my 66 far more often if I wasn't trying to limit the miles - for both insurance and preservation purposes.
Its real easy to unscrew the speedo cable on the '66!.....
While I like old vehicles,I do like power steering and brakes too,(though there are 2 less things to give grief if the vehicle lacks them)..
I like the simplicity and ease of repairs on old trucks,and they usually don't need to be fixed all that often once you get things roadworthy..
When I had my '72 Chevelle 4x4 wagon,it had a Rockwell t-case and at first the whining gears sounded cool,much like a 6-71 blower,but it got tiring on a trip...
I've ridden in and drove a few early 60's Suburban 4x4's and they too are noisy,ride rough,and are rather cumbersome to park,especially a panel truck..but they look so cool,it makes up for all the minuses...
One truck I miss is the '79 C10 "Bonanza" I had...it started off with its original 250 six and a TH350,but after that lost the #6 piston to preignition,I put a 305 in it...which was "eh",as far as improvement..
But that truck rode nice,was geared for the highway,cruised nicely at 65 mph with no strain or screaming,and got 16 mpg,just as good on fuel as the 6.2 in my K2500...and it was quiet,comfortable,had great heat--hardly any rot for a new england truck when I got it too...if I saw one like it for around $1000 or less I'd buy it..so far only a few like it have come up for sale,and the price is triple that at least..
..While I like old vehicles,I do like power steering and brakes too,(though there are 2 less things to give grief if the vehicle lacks them)..
I like the simplicity and ease of repairs on old trucks,and they usually don't need to be fixed all that often once you get things roadworthy..
When I had my '72 Chevelle 4x4 wagon,it had a Rockwell t-case and at first the whining gears sounded cool,much like a 6-71 blower,but it got tiring on a trip...
I've ridden in and drove a few early 60's Suburban 4x4's and they too are noisy,ride rough,and are rather cumbersome to park,especially a panel truck..but they look so cool,it makes up for all the minuses...
One truck I miss is the '79 C10 "Bonanza" I had...it started off with its original 250 six and a TH350,but after that lost the #6 piston to preignition,I put a 305 in it...which was "eh",as far as improvement..
But that truck rode nice,was geared for the highway,cruised nicely at 65 mph with no strain or screaming,and got 16 mpg,just as good on fuel as the 6.2 in my K2500...and it was quiet,comfortable,had great heat--hardly any rot for a new england truck when I got it too...if I saw one like it for around $1000 or less I'd buy it..so far only a few like it have come up for sale,and the price is triple that at least..
Really appreciate all the comments and advice! After debating in my head I think I may get the M1008. I realize its not as comfortable as a newer truck but I've always wanted to own one. My plans are to make it nicer to drive. Adding some softer 4" springs, stereo, and a few other things. Eventually swapping the engine for something more powerful but thats next year after the K5 is up and running. Going there tomorrow to pick it up and the seller is holding it for me until then. The price $3k and you can't really beat that for a rust free truck with 50k miles.
This is a great driver. 37s make it highwayable but it neeeeeeds floor and firewall insulation. That will help a ton. The noise level is very high but I can barely hear it over my smile. 4" lift and 37s with a drop pitman arm. Great combination.
That's a 4 inch and 37s. Little trimming. But cucv have a huge fuel filler. Note the fuel spilled in the pic you have. You gotta stand there and hold the filler nozzle. Can't leave it.
That one looks really nice and not beat too bad. Look into peel and seal and frost king stick on insulation. Works really well.
That one looks really nice and not beat too bad. Look into peel and seal and frost king stick on insulation. Works really well.
x2 on the 4 inch lift and trim. you can fit 38s . I would buy the m1008. then keep a look out for a banks turbo kit and a 700r4 for the overdrive gear. I daily drove/wheeled a CUCV blazer like that for years
I see that the truck is here on the western slope. Are you as Well?
Post more pics when you get It!
Post more pics when you get It!
T
tenderfoot
Guest
I know this isn't in the cards but through this whole thread I kept waiting for the: Man, it would be so cool to buy both and cannibalize the '86 to build the '68 with. Cuz man, that would be cool
I have a 67 c20 converting it to a K10 . Almost done. Several people have told me this has gone from a $5000. investment to a $12000.
Personally, if it were me, I'd go with the K20. 67-72s are getting so hard to find that people are settling for the 73-87 square bodies. Those will never have the classic look of the 67-72s regardless of condition.
I also have a 67 stepside short bed toy, and a 69 c20.
I got on GOV Planet right after I read this thread and ObijuanK5 posted his pic..got me all dreamy. found a m1008 in Layton UT. right down the street from my brother, but the fan is on the front seat and the rear driveshaft is bent. they didnt start it and thats a.little too much for risk for a $1500 starting bid.
Axles are worth more than 1500 here
Unless if the M1008 was trashed like beyond repair, it would be tough to cannibalize it just for the axles. The 68 K20 actually has a stout rear axle and 4.56 gears. I think the guy sold it anyways since he never called me back.
I agree the 68 would be worth more money in fixed up state but I was little worried about how far the rust had spread in the cab. Along with having to convert it to power steering and power brakes. Not hard, just time consuming and I need to stay focused on the K5. I did find another 68 K20 in Fruita, CO but still needed lots of work.
I don't think they ever offered turbos on these trucks unless you're talking about adding the 6.5 turbo. Researched that and you need to keep the boost to a minimum since the pistons are pretty week. I read about 200-220hp max, still good torque though.
They are out there but getting hard to find. I saw that one too and its worth 1500 in a non running state, axles alone are worth that. It will probably go for more but you never know. Some people are starting to ask a good amount for them.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/1986-Chevr...ash=item4d6ac1dadf:g:ZjUAAOSwBjdZ8PZN&vxp=mtr
So anyway.... I got the M1008. That sucker BARELY fit on the uhaul trailer. Front tires with the aftermarket low offset wheels were a bit too wide but I managed to squeeze them in the rails. Back tires barely fit from the edge. Loaded the extra tires and some other things in the back of the 1008. Very bad idea. Had horrible trailer sway above 55mph and I about crapped my pants. Loaded the tires and stuff in the Dodge tow vehicle and all was good.
T
tenderfoot
Guest
Same advice you’ve gotten but those trucks really need 4” on 37”s. It’s perfect for the gearing. Cheap and easy to do and puts the engine right in its happy zone for cruising.
