Can Can
Pusher Man
Once again insurance is brought up. Why is raising insurance premiums a big deal for non seat belted drivers yet nobody bats an eye at the cost of paying for cancer or serosis treatment? I would love this to be explained to me. The cost of medical treatment from smoking or drinking is easily triple the cost of the unbelted motorist. So why does it seem logical to create a law mandating seatbelts yet allowing drinking and smoking like it's going out of style? And I am a smoker, occasional drinker and wear my seatbelt. My son was actually thrown from his mother's vehicle in her roll over accident. But in the end how is one that is actually less expensive to pay for illegal yet obvious ones that the cost is easily triple and the damage done is tremendously more perfectly ok as a choice? I mean factor in domestic problems from alcohol on top of it, heart disease, hell the list goes on and on. If anything that seems hypocritical. Seems like it's ok as long as it can be sold for money and profitable. If they offered a fun windshield ride I would imagine half of the people wouldn't have a problem with it. Anyone with a dying relative due to smoking or drinking would probably see this. The end result is the exact same. A hospital bed then a stainless morgue table.
And I am not advocating not using a seatbelt. I am simply curious as to the hypocrisy of one personal choice vs another when the end result is the same exact grave.
In Canada, our health care system is funded by taxpayers. I help pay for the treatment of diseases of tobacco users(me), people who drink alcohol(me), drug addicts(not me), overweight people(not me), diabetics(not me), people who choose to drive aggressively(not me 99% of the time), people who engage in unprotected sex leading to STDs(not me), people who partake in high risk sports(not me), people with psychological issues(not me 99.9% of the time), and on and on and on. Alcohol and tobacco users up here essentially pay for their treatment in advance due to skyhigh taxes on both.
I totally get your point about personal choice, but a gawdamn seatbelt is soooooo easy to use it shouldn't be up for debate. I'm all for less government in my life but this particular issue is quite simply a no-brainer. A seatbelt doesn't really cost me anything, isn't an inconvenience, and isn't hard to use. It's like the PPE of driving- your last line of defense. And looking at the overall quality of drivers in my area, I'll increase my odds of survival wherever I can find it.
As far as "allowing" smoking and drinking, there's one reason it has not been outlawed. Let's face it- both these activities bring a metric shitload of taxes to government coffers. On the flip side, seatbelt use does not generate an iota of income for the government, but those injured or killed where seatbelts are not used has the potential to cost the government extra funds, especially in Canada.

