CK5
Register an account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members.

Wich one?? Low Low range ORD's Doubler or??>>>>>>

Re: Wich one?? Low Low range ORD\'s Doubler or??>>>>>>

I was just giving you a hard time Russ.......I'm in a playful mood! It's FRIDAY!!!! /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif
 
Re: Wich one?? Low Low range ORD\'s Doubler or??>>>>>>

Hehe, no problem. I saw the smiley. /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif
 
Re: Wich one?? Low Low range ORD\'s Doubler or??>>>>>>

</font><blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr />
Anyway, I guess that is a problem with my understanding of the definition of &amp;#8220;helical gears&amp;#8221;. I thought those were considered &amp;#8220;bevel cut&amp;#8221; or something like that. Basically straight cut at angle. I thought helical gears were actually curved so that they tooth sort of slid into engagement. I&amp;#8217;ve also heard from multiple people that the &amp;#8220;straight cut&amp;#8221; gears of the 203 and 205 were largely responsible for the noisy cases&amp;#8230;

[/ QUOTE ]

You're right about the helical concept. The ring and pinion are helical gears. There is a wiping action between the two gears as they mesh. /forums/images/graemlins/cool.gif It provides more tooth contact area between the gears, but it also creates more frictional power loss.
 
Re: Wich one?? Low Low range ORD\'s Doubler or??>>>>>>

Any gear with straight cut teeth is considered a "spur" type gear. Any gear with an angle cut is considered a "helical" gear. Helical gears are stronger, but they do create thrust. I guess the question would be: Is the case capable of handling oposite thrust from what it was designed for? /forums/images/graemlins/crazy.gif


Mike
 
Re: Wich one?? Low Low range ORD\'s Doubler or??>>>>>>

Helical gears are not stronger. Straight cut are stronger. Look at all the race trannies and over the road truck trannies they are all straight cut. The reason for a helical gear is that it is a quieter running gear.
 
Re: Wich one?? Low Low range ORD\'s Doubler or??>>>>>>

I cut the following directly off of a gear manufacturers web page. I tend to believe their explanation.

<font color="green"> Gears with helical teeth can be used instead of spur gears to connect parallel shafts. Helical gears will withstand higher loading than an equivalent size spur gear; the reason is that when the mid-section of teeth are in contact, the line of contact runs from the outside diameter on one end of the tooth to the root on the other. In consequence the bending moment on the tooth is only a little over half as much as it would be for the entire load on the tip as in spur gears. Thus the load is transferred by sliding action rather than chopping which gives much more silent running than with spur gears and a better wear rate. End thrust has to be considered when using helical gears as the angle of the teeth produces an axial component; this end thrust will increase with helix angle. Helical gears are not interchangeable - a right hand helix will only run with a left hand helix. Double helical gears are sometimes used to eliminate end thrust. They consist of right and left hand helical teeth cut on the same gear (forming a herringbone pattern). The resulting teeth formation produces opposing axial components thus eliminating end thrust. These gears are very expensive to produce and are not used unless absolutely necessary. </font color>



Mike
 
Re: Wich one?? Low Low range ORD\'s Doubler or??>>>>>>

and the m21 rockcrusher uses less helix then an m22 to increase strength because?

truck trannys are expected to survive constant input torque of up to 2000#ft for near a 1000000miles(~2100#ft @ 1200rpm for Cummins 600hp @ 2100rpm Signature series)
not exactly a low $$ affair.
this could be to avoid the nasty heat generating end thrust problems.
 
Re: Wich one?? Low Low range ORD\'s Doubler or??>>>>>>

The M22 is the rock crusher and is the stronger and more desireable transmission! /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif

Mike
 
Re: Wich one?? Low Low range ORD\'s Doubler or??>>>>>>

I just called and spoke with a friend of mine that is the shop manager at Thompson Caterpillar. He informed me of the fact that most of the transmissions in big trucks have helical gears in them. He works on them every day and has had 3 months of gear training, so I believe him when he says that there are no strength issues with helical gears.


Mike
 
Re: Wich one?? Low Low range ORD\'s Doubler or??>>>>>>

Here's my take on the spur vs helical gear thing.

Sizes and loads being equal, the helical gear would have more load capability because there is more contact area spread across the tooth. As was pointed out, this makes it mesh smoother and quieter. The spur (straight cut) gear however, transfers the load more efficiently having less frictional losses due to less contact area and no thrust forces.

So in an application where getting the most power thru the g-box is a priority and high noise is not a problem, the spur gear design would be preferred.

On the other hand if low noise, load carrying capacity, and smoother operation are important - then helical would be best.

My old Jeep had straight cut gears in the D18 case.... and you couldn't even talk to each other runnin' down the hiway! Glad to have helical gears in the Blazer /forums/images/graemlins/thumb.gif!

Marv
 
Re: Wich one?? Low Low range ORD\'s Doubler or??>>>>>>

Well, while it appears that I am the certainly most confused person here (obviously not understanding the real difference in straight vs. helical gears), I'm not the only one with misunderstandings. /forums/images/graemlins/laugh.gif

Now, for my own evolving understanding, if the line between "straight cut" and "helical cut" gears is determined only by "straight cut" have teeth parallel to the gear axis, what (if any) major difference is there between "helical" gears with straight (on an angle) vs. curved teeth? My best guess is that the curved teeth (like a ring/pinion) makes the load transition smoother and more uniform across the entire tooth?
 
Re: Wich one?? Low Low range ORD\'s Doubler or??>>>>>>

Your guy needs a little more training. Every truck tranny I have seen has straight cut gears in them. All RTO Fuller and Eaton have straight cut gears. I do work for a place that grinds the gears for Eaton and I have ground bearing jounrals for the eaton trannies and they are all straight cut. Why do the TH475 trannies run straight gears instead of helical? Why are almost all Manual tranny first gears straight cut? Why does Jerico and Lenco Race trannies have straight cut?
 
Re: Wich one?? Low Low range ORD\'s Doubler or??>>>>>>

<font color="green"> Here's a good place to learn a little about the differences if you aren't positive on the difference between straight cut and helical gears.

Straight cut, or Spur -
gear-spur.jpg


Helical -
gear-helical1.jpg


Ring and Pinion gears I beleive are considered spiral bevel gears -
gear-bevel2.jpg


</font color>
 
Re: Wich one?? Low Low range ORD\'s Doubler or??>>>>>>

Aha, that's where I got the "bevel" gears term. I just had them reversed. I was calling the ring/pinion type helical, and the straight-on-angle gears “bevel cut” (although I guess I screwed up the name from spiral-bevel). At least I'm starting to figure out where I went so far wrong. /forums/images/graemlins/laugh.gif Thanks much! Maybe, just maybe, I'm not as dumb as I thought! /forums/images/graemlins/blush.gif
 
Re: Wich one?? Low Low range ORD\'s Doubler or??>>>>>>

I think I had my "H" words mixed up. /forums/images/graemlins/shocked.gif Hypoid is the term used to describe ring and pinion gears. That's where the teeth on the pinion gear literally "wipe" across the teeth on the ring gear as they mesh. The brain fades when ya get old! /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif
 
Re: Wich one?? Low Low range ORD\'s Doubler or??>>>>>>

Ok you are right, and the gear manufacturers that have the info on their sight that I posted above have no clue when it comes to making gears! Let me restate that he is the SHOP MANAGER! He has been working on big trucks for over 30 years! I think he probably knows a little about his profession! I think all of your questions relate to the thrust that is caused by the helical cut gears. Based on the fact that they have more contact area makes them stronger. In racing applications, the power loss caused by the energy loss through thrust is power that is not making it to the rear wheels. No matter how much you argue with me about this I am going to believe the guys that make gears over your opinion! /forums/images/graemlins/tongue.gif


Mike
 
Re: Wich one?? Low Low range ORD\'s Doubler or??>>>>>>

look again, Donovan MAKES THE GEARS.
I have the manuals for several Eaton Roadranger trannies in pdf form on my HDD I could send you to look at the gears for your self.
I can take digital image of fully disassembled 18 speed at work.

here you go, a link to Eaton pdf shop manuals.
 
Re: Wich one?? Low Low range ORD\'s Doubler or??>>>>>>

Interesting discussion but not really relevant here........
Nobody uses straight cut gears in a transfer case. Take a look on the "205 tech info" page on our site, it shows the input gears and their tooth pattern if you want to see what the 205 uses.

As for the Atlas/Klune/Doubler stuff, there is not strength question with a 205, there is with an atlas. We have sold Doublers to guys that have split the Atlas cases. They do break and you don't see it in rock crawling competition because nobody is running big power, big weight and big tires. There is nothing wrong with the atlas but keep in mind it was designed as a HD replacement for jeeps and small broncos, not a fullsize truck. And don't show me the "32 spline front output makes it 1-ton rated" deal, I'm don't really think a larger front output shaft increases the torque capacity of the case!
This doesn't mean the things automatically explode when you hit a rock, but it is possible under hard use with heavy vehicles and much more likely than busting a 205.

I've never been inside a Klune but the biggest problem I see with them in this discussion is cost. By the time you adapt the gearbox to the GM trans and the 205, you're well over $2K and don't have the transfer case yet. In a ford or jeep they make a lot more sense since you don't need extra adapters but the round bolt pattern doesn't bolt up to much in the GM world.

So, coming from a guy that builds and sells Doublers, here's as honest a critique as I can give:

Doubler Pros:
-Strength, nobody will dispute the torque capacity king is the 205, and the 203 is no slouch either. Doublers don't break. Literally. We have one broken shaft out of all our kits and it was a 27 spline version. Our shaft is also hardened so it's strong and durable, meaning the splines won't wear out in a few years. You can break the 205 output shafts in some circumstances but that usually has to do with driveshaft problems. And if you do break, parts are pretty common and available.
-Gear selection, you can have a 2:1 or 4:1, and in the future should have the 2:1, 3:1, 6:1 option with low gears in the 205. I really think this can yeild all the low gears a guy can effectively use and gives good variation for running different terrain.
-Cost, most of our customers spend a good bit less than $2K overall for a Doubler setup, and it's typically FAR less. You can get away with as low as the $740 base kit if you scrounge parts well and fab your own shifter. There are a lot of different levels depending on how much of the work you want to do yourself. Availablility is wrapped up in this, many people already have the right parts, or some of them.
-You can easily swap brands in your drivetrain, ford front axles with GM engines and trannies are becoming more common and it's easy with our kit.

Doubler Cons:
-Weight, the overall is about 230-240#. The 205 alone is about 135# and the 203 gearbox with our adapter is about 100#
-Length, the Doubler overall is longer than a single gearbox. It compares favorably with any other add-in underdrive though and typically the length is fine in a truck. It's the same as the 203 that came from the factory in a lot of our trucks, and shorter than the 208 that was also factory in a lot of our trucks.
-availability with some transmission? We can adapt to about anything but some of the adapters are hard to scrounge up and can be expensive. If you have a TH350 or TH700 though, the parts are very common and cheap.

Atlas Pros:
-Weight, the case is about 110#.
-Length, it's about 5-6" shorter than a Doubler. This can hurt the front driveshaft while helping the rear, so it can be bad or good.
-Strength is reasonable but not guaranteed for a truck. If you break, the parts come from one place.
-You can swap sides with the front diff easily.
-Slightly deeper gear ratio available in the 4.3:1 version.

Atlas Cons:
-strength is reasonable but not guaranteed for a truck.
-Cost, no matter what, you pay advance a lot. There are no parts you can find on your own.
-Single low range only. No in between gear ratios, you're either high range or low.

Klune Pros:
-2.72 low gear is a little lower so you have another ratio available and the overall low is lower than a standard 2:1, 2:1 setup. But with lower 205 gears available this is not an issue.
-bolts in easy if you have a ford......

Klune Cons:
-Cost is huge in a GM.
-I don't know about the strength, it's probably fine.
-putting the lower gears in front of the 205 isn't the smartest place. The lower gears belong in the t-case for best strength.

So, there you go.
 
Re: Wich one?? Low Low range ORD\'s Doubler or??>>>>>>

Thanks MJ for posting that. One of the big reasons for using a Helical gear is manufacturing cost. Everybody knows that a straight cut gear is noisy unless you grind the gear or Hone the gear but that is very expensive to do. It is something like 5 times the cost of the gear. The reason the manufactures make helical gears is because they are quiet and there is no need for a second operation like grind or honing. Now they might shave the gear to bring the profile in but that is very reasonalbe to do and doesn't cost a lot to do but it is not as good as gearing or honing the gear. BTW the Dana 18 and Dana 20 T/C had straight cut gears on the low range side of the T/C and the NP208 had straight cut gears in it.
 
Re: Wich one?? Low Low range ORD\'s Doubler or??>>>>>>

never knew about the 208, the dana20 is not even constant mesh, is the 18 same style sliding gear?
 

Latest Posts

Top Bottom