CK5
Register an account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members.

1966 Chevy C20

I agree. It seems like you are stuck on using the FCC when it has been and continues to be a proven failure?
I understand the allure and agree, but if it doesn't work, the allure of it goes away.
 
Drove one of those for a while, 66 C10 Custom, had the chrome grills on the B Pillar area, black below the windows and white top. It was also a 3 on the tree. Bigger tires in the back I think they were 31's somebody put on because they thought it looked cool. ; ) with similar white wagon wheels.
 
Why again with the fuel command failure system?


And I have a aluminum square bore intake for sale

I agree. It seems like you are stuck on using the FCC when it has been and continues to be a proven failure?
I understand the allure and agree, but if it doesn't work, the allure of it goes away.
I figure in the case of this truck that's the least obtrusive route to go. I'm trying to minimize the modifications from stock. Likely a frame rail mounted pump could work well given the location of the tank being so high - it's behind the seat for anyone unfamiliar with the older trucks.

Maybe I could do a frame rail pump and run new lines to a FiTech and leave the original line in place. Or maybe the original fuel lines could be removed and saved.

It idles a little rough right now but once the RPM's are up to start driving down the road it runs great. I'm thinking it needs a tune up. I'm going to put the new distributor, plugs, and wires in and then see how well I can get it tuned. If I can get it to idle better, I may just leave the carb on there. At least keep it on the truck longer than I had planned at any rate.
 
So here's the interesting info I found about the truck in an old manual.

1966-Chevrolet-Truck-17.jpg


1966-Chevrolet-Truck-19.jpg


1966-Chevrolet-Truck-20.jpg



Transmission (mine is the one on the left):

1966-Chevrolet-Truck-130.jpg


1966-Chevrolet-Truck-126.jpg



The suspension on this thing could be easily upgraded without taking it far from the factory setup.

1966-Chevrolet-Truck-76.jpg


1966-Chevrolet-Truck-78.jpg


1966-Chevrolet-Truck-79.jpg



Engine info:

1966-Chevrolet-Truck-113.jpg


1966-Chevrolet-Truck-114.jpg


1966-Chevrolet-Truck-115.jpg


1966-Chevrolet-Truck-116.jpg


1966-Chevrolet-Truck-117.jpg
 
Last edited:
Thats a cool truck--I have yet to own a '60-'66 GM truck,and always loved the styling of them,especially the '61 hoods with the eyebrows--and the Panel trucks of that vintage were the best looking ones next to the '56-'57 models..
My older brother had a '66 Suburban caryall with windows,had a 283 and a Powerglide in it...Turquoise blue with white on top,was a sweet truck..(had the tailgate though,not barn doors--booo!)..

I read a lot of that spec sheet,and its pretty interesting to note a '66 straight six 250 had 155 HP,and 235 ft/lbs of torque--that is nearly identical as a 6.2 diesel's specs,and the peak torque is reached at 1600 rpms,also much like the diesel...(I bet the 250 six would beat a 6.2 in a drag race!)..

The "Chevy" manual 4 speed is likely a SM420--those are as strong as a SM465,I have seen many in school busses and dump trucks of that vintage...it is surprising they had two versions of that New Process 4 speed with different 3rd gear ratios for the bigger trucks with 2 speed rear axles..

I have the rear half of a '62 C20 pickup frame that someone cut down to make a trailer out of it, sitting in my backyard--has the 1 ton rated coil springs and control arms (which were rotted and patched up with angle iron)--it has an Eaton full floating rear diff with 4:56 gears..not posi,as fas as I can tell...the frame is still solid as a rock,it was a shame whoever had that truck didn't just fix it up!..

I would love to find a truck of that vintage around here for a reasonable price--unfortunately the few that exist look worse than the "barn find" one,and people still want 3000+ bucks for one in sad shape...4x4 ones are even rarer here and priced higher..the '60-'66 trucks seem to rot worse than the '55-57's here,and the later generations,so its harder to find a good one..
 
That 1966 horsepower rating is a Gross number, which is much more optimistic than the Net numbers the 6.2 was rated at.

Martin
 
The 250 straight six net numbers are 125HP/220TQ according to this manual, FWIW.
 
Pretty close still--probably still beat the 6.2 in a drag race--the 250 six can rev past 3600 rpms!..:D..
 
I thought this page was funny. On the right hand side under 195 thermostat what is is an "Air Injection Reactor System"? Is that a predecessor to the flux capacitor?

2017-03-13 19.40.09.jpg
 
Secondary air injection. An early form of emission control. The idea being introducing oxygen into the exhaust manifold allows unburnt fuel from combustion to be burnt in the exhaust.
 
I'm surprised they put A.I.R. on a pickup then.
Nice documentation!
 
Got to thinking about the motor rebuild in this truck. It was done in 1990. I found a receipt that mentioned "valve work" from the machine shop. Do you think they would have put hardened valve seats in the heads in 1990 as just a matter of common practice or might the machine shop have left them as is an just lapped the seats?

I haven't had any luck getting a hold of the previous owner and I'm not sure if he'd remember/know. Just been worrying if I should be putting additive in if this motor still needs regular/leaded fuel. I remember the '64 I owned in the early 90's needed leaded gas in the original 283 and you could still find it in gas stations.
 
If it's been that long, they stopped putting additive in it already. The valves would probably be hammered out already
 
I was wondering if maybe he had been running premium fuel to offset some of the damage. The truck has about 15K miles on it since the rebuild, you think that's enough miles to have messed up the exhaust valves? Bearing in mind he probably could have been readily able to find leaded fuel up until about 2000. I know for sure I could get leaded fuel around here up until '93. Stopped paying attention after I joined the Navy and put a 350 in my '64.
 
Any machinist worth his salt put hardened seats in that. If not I'd question the quality of the rebuild as a whole

Put a vacuum gauge on it
 
The place that did the machine work in 90 isn't around anymore but don't know if that means anything.
 

Latest Posts

Top Bottom