Oh I don't have an issue with that.No boost.
With all the blow by in this motor it would probably just boost oil right out of the main seals.....

Oh I don't have an issue with that.No boost.



Me neither.Fancy.
I haven't looked at PF4 tablet in weeks![]()
It does work. It comes off the driver side head. You can see it below the oil pressure gauge. ECT will run up to about 195 before the fan kicks on for the first time. After that it runs about 177 to 183.Does your temp gauge in the dash not work? Is that 190 coolant temp? I can't make it out...
Yeah, one in the head and the CTS in the intake.So you have two temp gauges now?
I do too. If I'm going to be on the highway I'll run torque through my phone or chromebook. But I have done that enough I know if the stock gauge is at the middle hash mark it is at 200°. It is close enough I can tell at a glance without using my phone or other device.I certainly like just having a number instead of trying to math out what each of the tick marks between 100 and 250 represent and what the gap between marks might be as well.
Dyno is one thing. Real world on the ground is something else. I’ve never had any vehicle I’ve own get better mileage on 85 than 87, or on 87 than 91. That was tracking it on a spread sheetI just watched a recent episode of Engine Masters where they did dyno testing on different octane fuel; 87, 91, 110, 116. At the end of the day the octane didn't had minimal effect on power. Timing didn't even change. As @imiceman44 mentioned this is because octane rating has to do with the resistance to knock. This was also backed up by some other internet reading I did.
So bearing all that in mind, it has me wondering why I've seen the MPG improvement. I didn't make any changes to the EFI. Was I getting some pre-detonation on the 85 octane 10% ethanol stuff? Because that would have dropped engine efficiency. The fuel is coming from a different station, so maybe it's just better fuel?