CK5
Register an account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members.

1991 with bench seat and early model steering wheel?

AJMBLAZER said:
Dude, mine is like...just comfy. The wife even likes it and Big Ugly sorta isn't her style...or height. I get no complaints about us taking Big Ugly as long as I can help hoist her into it.:D
No disagreeing that it's fairly comfy, I just wish it was taller for my upper back.

The Dodge D60's inners are small, like D44 size. A lot of the guys over on PavementSucks got 2500's and 3500's for the "1 ton stuff" and were not happy when they exploded front axle parts that just shouldn't have gone. Ford D60's and even the new AAMCo 9.25" front are hot swaps over there last I knew. You won't see many people swap the Dodge D60 of this era into other trucks.
The CAD...it's just sorta like the GM IFS CAD and after a while it gets unreliable and problematic. Also apparently can be a weak spot of the housing but only under hard abuse. The guys on big tires and wheeling the piss out of their trucks had the issues with that. However Dodge did seem to make note of this as in the last year of that body style (02) they went to a 1-peice longside inner and left the CAD system off entirely. No 2-peice axleshafts or CAD but the front was always spinning after that.
AH HA! :haha: What you are reading on has to do with wheeling.... I have no idea about any of that and that, it's the drag racing and sled pulling that I know about. It's unusuall to break any D60 under those circumstances. They may be breaking them on giant rocks, I don't know, but who wheels a 25-40K worth of diesel pickup anyway? For those that you mention are using them to swap into other vehicles...regardless of their success or not, they are using them in different fashions and is falling off topic for new school vs. old school. I guess anyway.:D

Yep, heard of the 6 speed but yeah...that option costs more than some of my vehicles. The NV4500 issue seems to have been a Dodge only issue as I've never heard or seen of it on GM's or Fords with the tranny. I might have missed that part though.
It's a Dodge only issue because they are the one's using a Cummins in front of it. It's the vibrations of the inline 6 diesel that makes that 5th gear nut come loose. Thats the only problem I am aware of with the NV4500 in any of the brands. While the 5th gear nut is a problem, it's not really Dodge's fault, I would presume anyway.

Again, I've seen and heard so much trouble with these transmissions, even on stockish trucks, that sorry, can't blame it solely on the engine. A friend has a 250k STOCK Cummins Ram that is a work truck and it's on tranny 3 or 4 now. Engine keeps going, doors are rusting, dash rattles, transmissions fall to pieces on him. Oh yeah, he's a landscaper so it's not like he's pulling bulldozers with the thing.

Never said either would. However how about an Allison? Seems like GM's the only one recently who went and actually put an auto transmission worth a $hit behind their diesel. I know my TH400 will live and survive happily behind my 6.2L or any other engine from that era for decades. They used appropriate drivetrain components for the engines and work requirements expected of those vehicles.
Well, on the other hand I've seen many Dodges in the range of mine get tons of miles out of stock autos at stock power levels. My auto was still in decent shape mechanically at 116K but went ahead and rebuilt it because it was so gummed and varnished up from original oil that I just decided to go through it and add performance stuff anyway. They are kind of like Th700R4's, there are ones out there that fail early, and people let everyone hear about it, but the truth is most last a long service life, but no one makes a big deal about that.

GM broke ground with the Allison, thats for sure. Ford also did a good job with the Torque Shift. Now Dodge has a 6spd auto and all three are building stout autos that are overbuilt for their intended purpose, just like a Th400 with a 350sbc in front of it back in the day. Regardless, the 4L80E did a good job behind the 6.5TD (granted, it got off light because the 6.5 is fairly weak compared to the PSD and 6BT), the e40D/4R100 did fairly well in the Ford, and for the most part the Dodge autos have done decent too.

I had a Th400 fail with about 70K on it behind a stock 454 in a C30 dually that rarely pulled much, and never anything over 5K. The previous owner of my K30 crew had to replace the Th400 in that truck at 78K. Does that mean a Th400 is a pile? Of course not. My grandpa put 340K on an E40D auto behind a PSD, that trans was supposed to be junk from the factory too.

Components fail all the time that aren't supposed to, regardless of year or brand. Autos are probably the worst (or best really) example of this.



Yep, the reason I went with an older truck was after pricing used Super Duty diesels (90% of which are former plow trucks up here:mad:), I'm leary of the 03+ Ram 2500's yet, and then seeing the price tag (with the GM A plan discount of my uncle's) of a bare bones stripper model GMC K2500 6.0L, 5 speed stick, vinyl floormats, no options but cruise, tilt, AC, and a sliding rear window truck...yowza...I ran away. It'd have been like having two mortgage payments. Just out of reach of the common man.
Besides, the dealership couldn't understand why I wanted a truck like that and they kept trying to show me the $10k more expensive fully loaded truck they had sitting on their lot...with an automatic.:rolleyes:

I for the most part completely agree. That is why my service truck is a 1981 K30 crew. It was cheap compared to something newer diesel powered. It's fairly simple, it works well, gets the job done, and 3+3's are just flat cool.


Oh yeah, did I mention my '99 Ram's "humming" door locks that somehow everyone in the world could hear EXCEPT for the employees of the Dodge dealerships I took it to? A1 customer service there.:crazy:

Poor drainage in the doors. Water pools inside the bottoms of the doors and doesn't drain out like it's supposed to. Dodge has known about it since at least the late 90's but has never willingly acknowledge it or fixed it. Guys who still had their trucks under warranty occasionally got it fixed but that was uncommon. My '99 at 3 years old and 33,000 miles had rust bubbling up under the paint at the exterior bottom of both doors. It was a dirt free cream puff when I got it like that too. My queries about using the body rust part of the warranty got me flat refusals and comments like I was nuts for even asking.
Not sure what the bumpers issues are but around here it's not uncommon to see a Ram of this vintage with golfball to softball sized holes in the door and completely rust coated bumpers.
Sounds like you had a ton of problems with yours. That is a bummer to hear. So far I've had to change a lift pump, build a new auto ( I had to push for that because I wanted perf. parts), and new A/C pump due to a leaky front seal. 144K on the ticker.
 
The guys who were breaking their stuff weren't all hard core wheeling. Mostly it seemed like diesel weight + power + big tires + traction = BOOMPOP! Rocks, muds, sand, etc it's happened over there. Guys were breaking them with the V8 and V10 engines as well.

My Ram was just a nightmare. I had it for 10 months and 10k miles. It was the age and mileage I mentioned before when I got it in late '02. Both unit bearings, front u-joints, the air intake manifold's plenum pan and gasket, the rust, the wiggly steering box (check into a brace for yours), and the door locks were all issues that I had to deal with in that time. I finally gave up when it occurred to me that all that got me a big truck with issues that got 12mpg on a good day.
There used to be, might still be, a post stickied to the top of the Dodge forum on PS.com that was something like "welcome to owning a 94-01 Ram". The whole thread was folks telling of the common problems, their fixes, and warnings. It wasn't pretty. It'd be like coming here and folks basically telling newbies to avoid 73-87(91) GM's for X, Y, and Z.
 
OH my head this thread is to much like reading a school book its hurting my eyes. can you start doing a short version?
 
If you don't want to learn, don't bother reading.
 
Personally I am currently thinking of restoring all the trim on my K5 Silverado. Seems like every Blazer I see, either has had it removed or is the base model that never had any to begin with. I hate chrome, but I want my K5 to stand out from the crowd. Now if I can just find a set of original K5 fender tags I will be all set. Preferably NOS to match the new Silverado rear quarter tags that I put on.
 
Wait a minute...

A CK5 moderator is fueling the biggest thread hijack of the week to hype up Dodges? I can see how the thread got there, but won't this be an uphill battle on this message forum?
 
I think there used to be something about a grill in this thread. My '91 K5 has that grill too. At first I didn't like it and wanted to swap it out for an early 80's vertical stack 4 headlight version, but it has grown on me. It is uncommon, I think it looks good, and that is all the reason I need to keep it (not to mention it would save me some work and $$ :D ).

My K5 also came with a rubber mat instead of carpet, AWESOME. That is probably why the floor isn't completely rotted out. Rubber mat + manual windows and doors + anti-bling grill + half as many headlights to brake and replace = Perfect. All those fancy options are just trouble.
 
Blue85 said:
Wait a minute...

A CK5 moderator is fueling the biggest thread hijack of the week to hype up Dodges? I can see how the thread got there, but won't this be an uphill battle on this message forum?

Well, first it was base model vs. fully loaded Silverado, then it was new school vs. old school, then it was talking about the qaulity of new products these days, not really any brand particularly, but with a Dodge for example.

There really wasn't much to hyjack, it was just another "look at this Ebay find" thread.

Threads like these are fun, good converstation, informative, and entertaining IMHO. Feel free to join the conversation man.:thumb:
 
I'm still waiting for the rpo code for a bench seat in a Blazer, I have never seen one ever in all my looking and how do you shift the t-case with that seat in the way. The seat in that Blazer doesn't match so either post rpo's or pics or I'm not convinced it was ever offered.
 
Well, a few of you guys may not like factory trim, but I plan on still ordering the Silverado molding that run down the truck along the bottom. It got taken off at the paint shop a few months back and was too rotten to go back on. I did however manage to put new wheel well trim back in, and get some cool clear side markers.
100_0522.jpg
 
I like blue.




























I had to bring down the word count to post ratio a bit, sorry.
 
bear76 said:
I like blue.
I had to bring down the word count to post ratio a bit, sorry.

:haha: :haha: :haha: :bow: you da man now i can read it better. When they to lonh I get lost and lose my thoughts. I guess i have that A.D.D. :o

BTW like the black truck
 
surpip said:
i thought that was a funny quote from the add
Ditto, I was thinking in my head as I read it "more like no power and 9mpg"....
 
The thing I wondered...as I was looking at the 6 lugs...was did they bother to regear?
 
AJMBLAZER said:
The thing I wondered...as I was looking at the 6 lugs...was did they bother to regear?
Your first guess is probably right.....
 
You never know...I've seen a lot of guys around here regear their half ton stuff instead of going with bigger axles first. They don't seem to get the idea...but then the other group just never does anything and wonders why they get 8mpg...
 
Top Bottom