Please dont take this as being rude or anything like that but Ive been studying on this for a couple years now.
But yes, that's the conventional wisdom but then everyone who says that sells a 2" top mounted lift spacer that's at a minimum 1.25" thick so is it or isn't it? The "Extended" Radflo shock is only about 1/4" longer than the OE shocks I've measured and still nearly 1/8" shorter than the Bilstein 5100s I had.
Now, I've seen my share of upper ball joints pulled apart. Usually because folks run top spacers and OE UCAs which puts all the stress of the suspension extension on the ball joint when it hits the coil bucket instead of the shock's overall length stopping the motion.
I can't find concrete numbers either. I've searched and studied and other than "conventional wisdom" and "word of mouth" I can't find any information as to why top mounted 2"+ lift spacers on stock shocks is fine and universally accepted but more than a 1" lift spacer on Rads or whatever "performance" shock isn't.
But yes, that's the conventional wisdom but then everyone who says that sells a 2" top mounted lift spacer that's at a minimum 1.25" thick so is it or isn't it? The "Extended" Radflo shock is only about 1/4" longer than the OE shocks I've measured and still nearly 1/8" shorter than the Bilstein 5100s I had.
Now, I've seen my share of upper ball joints pulled apart. Usually because folks run top spacers and OE UCAs which puts all the stress of the suspension extension on the ball joint when it hits the coil bucket instead of the shock's overall length stopping the motion.
I can't find concrete numbers either. I've searched and studied and other than "conventional wisdom" and "word of mouth" I can't find any information as to why top mounted 2"+ lift spacers on stock shocks is fine and universally accepted but more than a 1" lift spacer on Rads or whatever "performance" shock isn't.