Let me just clarify that I'm not saying the 700r4 is the be-all, end-all transmission.......but I still stand by my point that it has an undeserved bad rep. I also think it's quite ironic that bad reputations are being discussed on the 6.2 diesel engine board, which is probably the king of all undeserved bad reputations. I have a lot more people try to bad mouth the 6.2 in my truck than the 700r4. I also still hear the term "Quadra-junk" referencing the quadra-jet carb on a regular basis and you will be hard pressed to find somebody stating how crappy the 6.2 or quadra-jet on this board is nowadays.
Design flaw? Maybe in the first couple years of production but so does just about any other brand new major component on a car. 250k miles on a TH350 or TH400.....come on now, don't try to pull that crap. Sure, there are some that can make it that long but I also know of 700r4's that can make it that long also. Growing up every farmer and construction company seemed to have a Chevy/GM truck with a TH350 or TH400 and almost every one of them needed rebuilt somewhere in the 100k-150k range. Sorry, but I also didn't any SM465's go 250k untouched (I consider the clutch part of the transmission)...granted it's not a full rebuild but still rather pricey to have a shop do it.
There are a ton of trucks on the road today well into the 100k range on the original 700r4's.
The comment about "a factory crate replacement only lasted 20k so that means 700r4's are junk" is just as bad as any other comment about rebuilts or replacements not lasting. How long did the original last? So what is the supposed exact same component failed in 20k when the original lasted 100k, 120k??? Just says the same thing.....bad installation. Finicky? There's really only one adjustment and that's the TV cable........and making sure you flushed out the cooler and other items that are just as important as any other transmission replacement.
Again, not saying the 700r4 is the all time best, or cheapest, or easiest to work on...just that it is a decent trans with a undeserved bad rap.
Design flaw? Maybe in the first couple years of production but so does just about any other brand new major component on a car. 250k miles on a TH350 or TH400.....come on now, don't try to pull that crap. Sure, there are some that can make it that long but I also know of 700r4's that can make it that long also. Growing up every farmer and construction company seemed to have a Chevy/GM truck with a TH350 or TH400 and almost every one of them needed rebuilt somewhere in the 100k-150k range. Sorry, but I also didn't any SM465's go 250k untouched (I consider the clutch part of the transmission)...granted it's not a full rebuild but still rather pricey to have a shop do it.
There are a ton of trucks on the road today well into the 100k range on the original 700r4's.
The comment about "a factory crate replacement only lasted 20k so that means 700r4's are junk" is just as bad as any other comment about rebuilts or replacements not lasting. How long did the original last? So what is the supposed exact same component failed in 20k when the original lasted 100k, 120k??? Just says the same thing.....bad installation. Finicky? There's really only one adjustment and that's the TV cable........and making sure you flushed out the cooler and other items that are just as important as any other transmission replacement.
Again, not saying the 700r4 is the all time best, or cheapest, or easiest to work on...just that it is a decent trans with a undeserved bad rap.