2008.07.13 UPDATE! - ENGINE MOUNTS BEGIN...
The process of establishing new motor mounts has begun. My mind was a bit fuzzy from being out of the shop for so long, so it really took me a while to get back into "the zone" with my thoughts on how to attack this problem.
The hardest part by far is the fact that with the new driveline position, NOTHING is in it's original location, and there are NO mounts on any of the driveline parts to help establish a reference for alignment (either front-to-back or laterally). My thought was to re-use the factory engine crossmember as a starting point and see if it could be modified to work with the new setup.
Since it's impossible to install the factory crossmember with the engine in place, I had to remove the Atlas from the driveline, then yank the engine & tranny (for about the 20th time!) to get the lower cradle into position in the framerails. Once I put the engine into position, I quickly realized that the crossmember was interfering with the oilpan on the new 502BBC. This is probably a combination of my desire to mount the engine lower in the framerails than the factory did AND what I believe is a larger or different shaped oilpan than the factory 350SBC.
In the interest of making forward progress, I decided to mount the lower cradle from underneath the framerail instead of laying it on top of the lower "C" in the frame. This gives effectively about 1" of extra clearance to the oilpan. The challenge is that this creates about 1" gaps between the framerails and the boltholes on the crossmember. For now, I simply loaded those gaps with thick stacks of washers to take up the space...as you can see here:
The next challenge was choosing the proper location for the crossmember to sit (front-to-back) in the frame. Since the engine was relocated 3" further back into the firewall area, you'd
think that the crossmember would also go about 3" back also. It doesn't. For some reason it lines up perfectly with the original crossmember frame holes!!! Don't ask me why, I'm still puzzling over that one. The nice part about that is that the lower crossmember will be lined up pretty squarely underneath the motor mounts and will give me plenty of options to fabricate the mount I'll need.
Strangely, the crossmember is extremely close to the oilpan in the area when the pan sweeps-up from deep to shallow. I think I will probably just grind down the lip on that side to gain maybe 1/8" of extra clearance. I will probably end up boxing up the crossmember once the design is finalized, so I'm not particularly concerned with strength. Here's a shot of that clearance issue with the oilpan:
The final part of the equation was to get the transmission pan raised up high enough to be safely between the framerails, with maybe 1/4" gap between the tranny pan and the skidplate that will eventually cover the entire bottom of the truck. The height of the transmission pan is a non-negotiable dimensional constraint, since I want it protected by a skidplate....so I had to solve the tranny height FIRST. Once I built a temporary tranny mount at the correct height, I put an anglefinder on the engine to see how "raked" it was. From there, I knew how tall the engine mount would need to be to get the engine back down to 0 degrees of rake. I don't want it "laid back" the way the factory does it.
Here is a shot of the motor mount bolted to the engine, with the round "puck style" motor mount. and a temporarly spacer. This is very close to it's final position in the truck. It need's to go maybe 1/4" to 1/2" lower than shown here...
And a shot from the driver's side.....
So that's where things are now. I have two more sets of those same rubber "pucks" that I will be using to create the transmission and transfercase mounts as well. I like the idea of using the same style of mount for the entire driveline. If I build the crossmembers correctly, they will be removeable and should allow for easier servicing of the truck later on.
