Check out this anti-wheeler poll @ turn it around

[84k5]

Not a scientifically valid survey.

It should say, a completely worthless survey. I voted anyway.

 

[jhellwig]

It isn't even against four wheeling. It is just against letting people tear around all the forest insted of just part of it. Their poll is screwed up anyways. The first answer doesn't even answer the question.

 

[79k20350]

62% after i just voted, lets put some ck5 muscle into it and show them whos boss!

 

[sled_dog]

I have to say I don't agree with it really... I voted No but at the same time. I see nothing wrong with restricting ORVs out of parts of National Parks. The problem is that when some idiot would get the power to decide that, he'd put aside 9 billion acres for hikers and 10 acres for ORVs.

 

[8_YOUR_H2]

I agree we need to support our hobby but I don't support fuktard dirtsticks who tear $hit up like that.

 

[daleearnhardt01]

I dont see where the big deal is, I agree with jhellwig in that the poll doesnt really work well with the issue at hand. If you read the article it states the new regulation would make it illegal to tramp anywhere you wanted. That does cause major damage and I dont see whats wrong with making that illegal and creating trails and areas where offroaders can play....

 

[trailblazr81]

After reading the article I would vote YES!! We cant be having idiots tearing up everything. I like to go have fun in my 4x4 but stay on the trails. But I did vote NO, we 4wheelers should be able to enjoy all areas, just not tear ass through the place.

 

[gjk5]

I agree in theory, but the way the poll is phrased it's either all or nothing, so I voted no.

 

[89GMCSuburban]

63% for us. Sled dog, it's not talking about national parks in the poll, the big issue about it is that it's national forests. Colorado is a good example. There aren't crap loads of PARKS around, but more than half the state is a national forest.

 

[jjlaughner]

63%

 

[mrk5]

No, off-roaders should be able to enjoy all areas of forests and grasslands

Yeah, it's an f'd up poll. Most people would vote yes given these choices. I would if I didn't realize there was an agenda here. I really believe there are few off-roaders that feel the should be able to go ANYwhere they want.

It's almost a lose/lose choice. By voting NO we look like ignorant land smashers that want to run over trees and little chipmunks. Vote yes and it sides with complete lock down of national forests.

 

[sweetk30]

64% now.

 

[txfiremank5]

* 5983 responses
Yes, all-terrain vehicles and motorized bikes are major sources of environmental damage.
36%

No, off-roaders should be able to enjoy all areas of forests and grasslands.
64%

 

[big94gmc]

65%!!! I can't tell you how many trail clean-ups I've been involved with. If 'whoever' shuts down trails, who'll do clean-ups after severe storms and whatnot??

 

[Cornfield creations]

66%, keep it coming!!!!

 

[badfish4tail]

Do you agree with the regulation to restrict off-road vehicles to certain parts of national forests? * 6483 responses


Yes, all-terrain vehicles and motorized bikes are major sources of environmental damage.
34%

No, off-roaders should be able to enjoy all areas of forests and grasslands.
66%

 

[darkshadow]

they must feel good about suport to shut down off roaders every time they START a poll, till it hits the forums.......
this was that same poll they had a while back.

and i agrree with thouse that have spoken, i dont think off roader should be locked out of any area, but restrictions must be met in thouse aeras.

 

[Smitty]

67%

 

[70jimmy]

68% now

 

[blazerguy 90]

68% for us, Just voted.