Frame swap w/ 96 3/4 ton

OKIEnVA

Registered Member
Premium Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Posts
33
Reaction score
0
Location
Stillwater, OK
So here's what I got going on. Got a 91 K5,(pops ordered from factory) been sitting in the pasture for going on over 10 years. Transfercase busted. engine worn out, front end worn out. Throughout the years I've had the dreams of getting this thing going again not for a daily, but trail rig. 2 years ago I acquired a 96 3/4 ton 4wd reg cab long bed. 454. The 96 runs great and nothing wrong with it mechanically. Original plan was yank the 454 and put in the blazer. Well recently I've had the idea of doing a frame swap. The 3/4 ton is longer for sure. I have a buddy that does welding and fab for a living. Am I missing something? Should I be able to shorten frame and driveshaft and be able to body swap? Seems like the way to go. Would love a LS swap but trying to just work with what I got already. Added pics of trucks in question.

trucks.jpg
 

shady

1 ton status
Premium Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Posts
12,182
Reaction score
8,655
Location
iowa
You could do it. The IFS is a drawback. And frame-body mounts will be fun. But it can be done.

If the frames good on your blazer I think it would be better to swap the engine and find a TC in the long run.
 

sweetk30

I build stuff
Premium Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2004
Posts
36,357
Reaction score
13,067
Location
horseheads , ny 14845
truck frame more flat rails

blazer frame is up and down a lot for the floor pan of the whole body .

and 88-up IFS vehicles got a frame that bow's out wider in the rear to the back bumper . so fitting our older body on them gets real fun .

rebuild your front axle / fix the tcase and be faster and less problems ahead .
 

muddybuddy

3/4 ton status
Premium Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2004
Posts
9,456
Reaction score
368
Location
Arlington, VA
I see the ck5 sticker on the windshield, you said its been sitting 10+ years in the same spot? Pull it out of the tall grass and take a look underneath. It should apparent if you need a new frame or not.
 

campfire

Adventure is out there!
Premium Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Posts
25,154
Reaction score
14,336
Location
Northwoods Wisconsin / da U.P.
and 88-up IFS vehicles got a frame that bow's out wider in the rear to the back bumper

It's also a few inches wider in the front sections. Take a bunch of measurements before you commit to a frame swap. The body mounts won't line up, so be prepared to fabricate new ones. If you're comfortable shortening the frame and recreating each body mount bracket, the swap should be doable.
 

86454K30

1/2 ton status
Premium Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2004
Posts
888
Reaction score
312
Location
Spokane Washington
Best bet is to put the 454 in the k5 and not try a frame swap. Most projects like that end up parted out and that would be a shame for that blazer.
 

beags86

Eastbound and Down
Premium Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2011
Posts
14,471
Reaction score
19,384
Location
In my shop
You could do it. The IFS is a drawback. And frame-body mounts will be fun. But it can be done.

If the frames good on your blazer I think it would be better to swap the engine and find a TC in the long run.
IFS is a drawback?
Said no one's spine ever.
 

shady

1 ton status
Premium Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Posts
12,182
Reaction score
8,655
Location
iowa
It is if your gonna really wheel it lol. And so far I haven't felt a huge difference in ride :dunno:. Maybe comparing a 78 dump truck to a 97 half ton or something sure. But if set up right a solid axle rides good.

Oh, and there's a reason there's so many SAS kits lol
 

beags86

Eastbound and Down
Premium Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2011
Posts
14,471
Reaction score
19,384
Location
In my shop
Oh, and there's a reason there's so many SAS kits lol

I Know I'll never win this argument. Never have and never will, but it's ok. I'll keep my soft riding ifs.
As far as the sas kits. It's only because if the rock climbers.
My unpopular opinion is that gm ifs is actually pretty strong stuff. Extreme hardcore wheeling. Sure you need a 60. It's only a closed minded views that sells sas kits. It's the same reason why it took almost 20 years of LS to be out before it became hot. Or the LS being the only way, your now looked at funny if you still have a sbc.
 

shady

1 ton status
Premium Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Posts
12,182
Reaction score
8,655
Location
iowa
Only thing I myself really have against the ifs is parts wearing out, and if you lift it it's worse yet. Just personally had more issues with them.
 

campfire

Adventure is out there!
Premium Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Posts
25,154
Reaction score
14,336
Location
Northwoods Wisconsin / da U.P.
I Know I'll never win this argument. Never have and never will, but it's ok. I'll keep my soft riding ifs.
As far as the sas kits. It's only because if the rock climbers.
My unpopular opinion is that gm ifs is actually pretty strong stuff. Extreme hardcore wheeling. Sure you need a 60. It's only a closed minded views that sells sas kits. It's the same reason why it took almost 20 years of LS to be out before it became hot. Or the LS being the only way, your now looked at funny if you still have a sbc.

I'm with Beags. The newer chassis will have nicer ride quality than the old chassis, both on- and off-road. My square suburban with its rebuilt suspension rides nicer than the average squarebody. But it will never ride as nicely as a proper IFS setup, and I'm reminded of this every time I drive it.

It might be a horse apiece if the donor rig needs a pile of suspension parts and the Blazer doesn't. But it sounds like the Blazer has been sitting a lot longer than the pickup.
 
Top Bottom