CK5
Register an account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members.

I bought a Corvette.

Back when I was young, I had several of the previous gen (or more accurately, the first of that gen, before they got neutered, 68-72). They could be made pretty darn fast, and I raced them until I cracked up in a highly modified '72 L82 at 135 (illegal street racing, I was young and stupid). Anyway, I always thought this later evolution made the more practical driver. At least you have a place for groceries and/or luggage for a short trip and such. The ones I had didn't have enough room behind the seats for much of anything. And hey, you still have the leaky T-tops!
 
They started to get a bit better in 78...75-77 were the worst years to get...anemic performance and like most other GM products of the era plagued with little problems all the time. Not that 78 was much better but at least it was on the upswing again.

I'd still rather have a '77.

Is that a L-82 emblem on that hood? It "should" have 4 bolt mains, but seems like that is always a hit or miss thing with GM. The L-82 is a 220hp 78-79
strip it down and make a autocrosser out of it!

It is an L82.

24-1.jpg

It is not the original block though.

24-2.jpg

24-3.jpg

These are the L82 heads though.

24-4.jpg

Wish it still had the factory valve covers.

24-5.jpg

Martin
 
Last edited:
According to John, it is:

"62 327 powerglide full-size built in Flint on March 30th."

Martin
 
According to John, it is:

"62 327 powerglide full-size built in Flint on March 30th."

Martin
Casting number is for 327 blocks, Casting date March 26, 1962, assembly date at the Flint, MI engine plant on March 30, and powerglide equipped model
 
Crazy that it was in a car four days after the block was cast.

Martin
 
Cool car, I've owned 3 of the 78-79 Corvettes with the L82 option, I like the fastback styling myself and the extra room it creates.
 
I did find out something interesting last night. In 1979 they made 3.55 gears standard, as opposed to 3.08's from the previous year. That is handy. I assumed it had terrible gears.

Oh, and I picked up a set of rally wheels this weekend, need to get them blasted and painted.

Martin
 
Crazy that it was in a car four days after the block was cast.

Martin
Crazy that it was in a car four days after the block was cast.

Martin
the numbers stamped into the block show the assembly date of the engine not the date of install to a vehicle although they were usually shipped to the vehicle assembly plant within days of engine assembly
I was told the engine assy and vehicle assy should have a window of 3 days to 6 mo to be considered correct numbers matching
 
Ah, I just assumed they stamped the suffix when the car was being assembled. Guess I was wrong.

Martin
 
Ah, I just assumed they stamped the suffix when the car was being assembled. Guess I was wrong.

Martin
The engines were built for a specific application (and that may cover a few different models of Chevrolets) but the VIN wasn't stamped until it reached the assembly lines....of course there are always exceptions, and some well documented as well.
 
What? How can this be? Your from Nebraska.... A 4wd vette would separate the men from the boys....
 

Latest Posts

Top Bottom