@AgDieseler, it looks like the pulley offset and the seal lip are both non-interchangeable between the two designs. How did you mix & match on your serpentine setup? Is your aftermarket crankshaft set up for a 6.2 balancer or a 6.5 balancer?
Here are the specs of my trans, the reason why @Greg Ducato suggested I forego the shift kit:
5 pinion front and rear planetary gears - factory GM parts
Beast Sun shell - thick billet steel
Corvette servo
New band clutches bushes seals washers gaskets
10 vein pump rotor
Drilled out plate
New sprag
K case

The tool looks handy. I just used a pipe wrench to secure my balancer. I've also used a pry bar on the flywheel, but that requires a second person.
What part of this spec list makes a shift kit a bad idea? This list is fairly similar to how my old 700R4 was built, and I don't recall the shift kit causing any problems.
Personally, I liked the firm shifts.
I just have a plain old 6.2 crank, with a regular stock replacement 6.2 harmonic balancer and ordinary 6.5 serpentine crank pulley. It was a very easy mix and match, and didn't cost too much.@AgDieseler, it looks like the pulley offset and the seal lip are both non-interchangeable between the two designs. How did you mix & match on your serpentine setup? Is your aftermarket crankshaft set up for a 6.2 balancer or a 6.5 balancer?
I just have a plain old 6.2 crank, with a regular stock replacement 6.2 harmonic balancer and ordinary 6.5 serpentine crank pulley. It was a very easy mix and match, and didn't cost too much.
David
So I went back and measured (as best I could) the crankshaft against the new HB shaft. Looks like I have a bit of room ...
View attachment 294503
And interestingly enough, the depths appear to be the same. Maybe the 6.2 HB will work on the 6.5?
View attachment 294504
View attachment 294505
I just have a plain old 6.2 crank, with a regular stock replacement 6.2 harmonic balancer and ordinary 6.5 serpentine crank pulley. It was a very easy mix and match, and didn't cost too much.
David

The measurements are the important part. If they match, bolt it up as a final check. I'd bolt it up now, before changing the seal, just in case it doesn't match (so you don't pinch the new seal). Oil the sealing surface before installation.
I don't understand why the shorter balancer isn't bottoming out against the crank boss. Seems like it could freely slide inward and wreck the seal if it's not hitting anything on the inside. I know it SEEMS like it takes a million pounds of force to budge the balancer, but it's not really that hard to slide on and off when it's new and shiny. So I would have thought it got a solid boss to press against. Which is why I reasoned that the crank should be different to match the shorter seal surface.
Those pictures match my recollection of my 6.2 engines.

I will say, I was surprised at how simple the removal process was for the HB. I had previously (ignorantly) considered this project to be one of the more difficult ones, and was proven wrong.
It's kindof a pain to get to it in the cramped engine bay, with the belt system, fan, and radiator shroud restricting access from the top. But that's the only snag. It's a really easy thing to change on the engine stand. Torquing that bolt by yourself can get tricky.
The measurements are the important part. If they match, bolt it up as a final check. I'd bolt it up now, before changing the seal, just in case it doesn't match (so you don't pinch the new seal). Oil the sealing surface before installation.
I don't understand why the shorter balancer isn't bottoming out against the crank boss. Seems like it could freely slide inward and wreck the seal if it's not hitting anything on the inside. I know it SEEMS like it takes a million pounds of force to budge the balancer, but it's not really that hard to slide on and off when it's new and shiny. So I would have thought it got a solid boss to press against. Which is why I reasoned that the crank should be different to match the shorter seal surface.
Those pictures match my recollection of my 6.2 engines.
Okay so I have uncovered some good information.
The 6.5 balancer is 3/4" shorter because there is suppose to be a reluctor wheel behind the balancer for the crank position sensor. I, however, do not appear to have any of this, even though I have a 6.5 block, because, I also have a DB2 mechanical injection pump, so there is no need for either the CPS or reluctor wheel, so my 6.5 block should be getting the 6.2 balancer with the 1.5" shaft, NOT the 6.5 balancer with the .75" shaft. So, either my block was not equipped with the reluctor wheel, or it was removed by a PO at some point in the past, and the incorrect 6.5 balancer was installed less the reluctor wheel.
Glad I decided to replace the balancer. Otherwise, I would never have discovered this and who knows what kind of problems I would have had if I kept running the wrong balancer.
Confirmed with Leroy Diesel that if the 6.5 block does not have a reluctor wheel then I should be using the 6.2 balancer.

YES! I love it when situations have a logical answer.
That would also explain why I didn't encounter this when working on my '93 6.5TD.

YES! I love it when situations have a logical answer.
That would also explain why I didn't encounter this when working on my '93 6.5TD.

I like your critical thinking process to get the correct conclusion. I go back to pictures all the time to see if I can find what I need. It always helps!