About 12-1/2”. Hard to accurately compare to original, but the bell housing parting line is back about a foot from where the 440’s would have been. Also, the LS is about 8” shorter than a 440.How far back is the engine from stock?
David
About 12-1/2”. Hard to accurately compare to original, but the bell housing parting line is back about a foot from where the 440’s would have been. Also, the LS is about 8” shorter than a 440.How far back is the engine from stock?
That’s awesome. It’s going to handle so good.About 12-1/2”. Hard to accurately compare to original, but the bell housing parting line is back about a foot from where the 440’s would have been. Also, the LS is about 8” shorter than a 440.
David
A 440/833 combo weighs about 1300 lbs without accessories. An LS3/Magnum weighs about 615 lbs fully dressed and filled with fluid. This combination is less than half to weight, and zero pounds are cantilever out beyond the front suspension.And how much lighter is the LS7 vs an original 440? Got to be a lot! When I have weighed some LS2 and LS3 they were 357 and 370 lbs.
Cost was the main driver. I wanted to, but the value of an LS7 was very hard to ignore.Still surprised you didn't go with a 441 so you could say it was a 440 lol.
Those 90s do like very nice, good start!Rev2 steering shaft location is close enough to get started on the headers, so I went to the OP and started getting into the Vibrant pallet.
The polished 2” CLR 90s are just beautiful. I’ll trim the legs for the centers.
View attachment 527530
View attachment 527531
View attachment 527529
SendCutSend collector mounts arrive tomorrow.
David
Burns is great quality. They make a similar polished 90/120 like Vibrant. Both of them run 1.87" mandrels down the legs of a deformed 90 so it's almost perfectly round.I've heard good things about burns as well. Perhaps the 90s are a better option, you would just need more of them.
Yeah, I'm sure they're trying to jog around something in the fox body floor pan. I'm building the exhaust before I do the tin work for the floors, so hopefully kinks like this can be avoided.they essentially put a big kink in the tube even though they did use piece of mandrel bend.
Best I can do is an early apology! Also, I'll build heat shields.I don't recommend turning the tailpipes around 3 sides of the fuel tank just to look like a center outlet. Yes, they did wrap the tailpipes, but I think its better not not go so close to the fuel tank for that long in the first place.
Yeah, I'm sure they're trying to jog around something in the fox body floor pan. I'm building the exhaust before I do the tin work for the floors, so hopefully kinks like this can be avoided.
Best I can do is an early apology! Also, I'll build heat shields.
I think it's mostly racecar cool, and any aero advantage come from how the exhaust (regardless of exit location) works within a well sorted diffuser program. I always liked the center exit of the CTS-V coupe, so that's my excuse.Is their any functional advantage of a center exhaust exit in road racing? Is it some aero thing with the tailpipes? Because I've always thought it looks weird but if there is a functional aspect I get it.
Yeah, man, you're focusing all of those CFMs into extra thrust. If the LS had a side exit, it would be pushing the back of the car off the road.Is there any functional advantage of a center exhaust exit in road racing?
Exhaust thrust is no joke….