No seriously, you HAVE to be kidding...ntsqd said:No, I am not.

No seriously, you HAVE to be kidding...ntsqd said:No, I am not.

rjfguitar said:No seriously, you HAVE to be kidding...![]()



A "real" dana 60? I didn't relize my truck had an imposter.... I am sure you are refering to ball joints and the CAD. We can forget about kingpins, they are a thing of the past and ball joints are here to stay. As far as the CAD setup, it's strength is not at all a problem, it's the vaccuum actuation that has given it a bad rep. I have never heard of the internal coupler breaking. It's still the same D60 housing, differential, and axles with the exception of the CAD parts. THere is no strength difference IIRC.Just curious, but why '94? I know that was the first year for the new body style. But was the cummins upgraded over the older version?
I kinda like the older style more, and I'd rather have a "real" dana 60 up front, not one of the crappy ones in the newer body style.
But is the engine changed that much
They do have a bad rep, but are pretty darned stout trannies with a couple "easy " upgrades. An aftermarket TC and VB to bump up the hydralic preesure drasticly....and a 4L80 looks like a 700R4.Dodge auto's have a pretty bad rep. I cant substantiate it, but...Well, you can read other forums for that.
I completely disagree. The absence of having to get off the throttle everytime makes a BIG difference in acceleration when the spool keeps dropping with the manual.Auto+Diesel=Very bad.
Who cares about desert racers? I also see a lot of service truck fords with lumber racks or a service bed driven by A/C repair men or what not, but no one that actually needs the truck for 90% towing. Look around, every other diesel pickup hauling cars for higher around here has a dodge dually. I am a farmer and know lots of farmers. Farmers almost always tow really heavy crap around. Most of the farmers I know drive dodges. The cummins dodge will out pull a powerjoke anyday.Yep, yer right I know nothing about nothing. Tim ,yer bedside manner is decidely lacking. Perhaps you'd be better off over on POoR?
It is exceedingly rare to to see a Cummins pulling any desert race vehicle anywhere. There are 7.3 PSD's all over the place. That tells me something. I do not know about the 6.0's, which is why I noted it with a ? mark.
On the other hand, the Cummins has long been noted for it's better mileage. So, I stand by my remarks.

I think we all relized that you said a PS would be better for heavy towing than a cummins, which is what we have all made comments on. No one brought up anythig about a 24V or 6.0...just you.ntsqd said:IF you would read what I wrote and not what you want it to read you would note that I NEVER said the Cummins wasn't a good choice for towing. I said that a PSD would be a better choice if that's all you plan to do with the vehicle. I later clarified that to mean only the 7.3 PSD and not the 6.0
Somewhere I got the idea we were talking about a possible engine swap, so a 24V Cummins or a 6.0 PSD are not a likely choices and I did NOT include them in my opinion.