Just another ho-hum crossover. Yay.
.
.
.It's weird watching the current Chevy commercial with Trax, Traverse and Equinox all lined up and realizing they're just sticking another CUV into that lineup.
They're just wagons, but sell for 25% more.
I don't understand this comment:https://amp.freep.com/amp/3299337002
This cracks me up..
They took the new Blazer down.. and put a Traverse in it's place.
Can anyone even tell them apart?
I think they missed the point.
People are pissed at GM closing plants in the US and Canada.
So if Trump closes the border does that mean the new Blazers can’t get here?
Bwahahaha!!!!
Actually, let's back up and discuss:
1) IF GMC gets their version of this, would they call it "Jimmy?" Why or why not would they get the model? ( Because all along chevy and gmc got the exact same models up to and including heavy duty class 8 trucks) And why or why not would they name it, "Jimmy?"
2) Why was GMC kept and Pontiac dropped? If anything GMC was more redundant to chevrolet than pontiac?
3) Could pontiac be GMC's "boutique brand?" (Which is ironic, because usually GMC was BOP's truck "add-on" line, but you already knew that.....)
They shoulda dropped the Buick line and kept the Pontiac line. At the time Pontiac had far more sales here than Buick did. I thought I'd read they kept Buick solely on the bet that the Chinese market would buy the Buicks for the name...
GMC, could almost be modified a bit - they're slightly more upscale than the chevy brand - but could use more work to really show that off..
It doesn't matter what the badging is.Right, but GMC has the acadia, which is the same as the traverse? And then, the terrain and i'm not sure which that one matches up with?
i feel GMC is a trend company, not a truck company anymore. Because GM isn't run by real men any more.
Therefore, i feel it's entirely conceivable that Pontiac could become GMC's "boutique" line; You know how chevy had "geo" for a while?