This is what I get for reading books... : )
In the Chev Engine book I was just reading (not at home, no title) the author was stating that the 400, as designed, is not a very good motor. Something about the stroke and bore, that too much of the energy is wasted on the cylinder wall, and it tends to wear them out relatively quickly. He even went on to state I believe, that GM was getting them back under warranty early in the 80's, that were already worn out. He stated, using the rod/bore idea, that the 383 is superior in at least the longevity department.
FWIW. I'd stick with a 350 if mileage was a concern, and if not, a 454.
Dorian
My tech/links page: <a target="_blank" href=http://www.dorianyeager.com/index2.html>http://www.dorianyeager.com/index2.html</a>
No anti-theft measures on your truck? No pity when its stolen
In the Chev Engine book I was just reading (not at home, no title) the author was stating that the 400, as designed, is not a very good motor. Something about the stroke and bore, that too much of the energy is wasted on the cylinder wall, and it tends to wear them out relatively quickly. He even went on to state I believe, that GM was getting them back under warranty early in the 80's, that were already worn out. He stated, using the rod/bore idea, that the 383 is superior in at least the longevity department.
FWIW. I'd stick with a 350 if mileage was a concern, and if not, a 454.
Dorian
My tech/links page: <a target="_blank" href=http://www.dorianyeager.com/index2.html>http://www.dorianyeager.com/index2.html</a>
No anti-theft measures on your truck? No pity when its stolen