CK5
Register an account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members.

Why There's No Big Block V6 ?

Huh, never seen that before.
I've been on that other website before.
Makes me chuckle a bit that they say it's a favorite of hot rodders.
Never once have I seen that. And I'm pretty versed, with lots of cars shows/ magazines/ interwebzs surfer. I feel like I'm reasonably in tune with alot of car stuff
Heard of it once before in some high dollar show car.
 
Ryan Falconer has been toying with Corvettes for a while and the V12 has been a pet project for quite a while, even though it is unique, lately it seems to be outperformed regularly by V8’s.
 
The Allison V12 is the one that gets me moist!..:D
WWII tech,but still one of the finest engines built by mankind IMO..
Like they say--there's no substitute for cubic inches--the Allison has 1,710 of them!..

Wish you could still buy one this cheap today !..:eek1:

Allison V12 for 350 bucks.jpg

Allison aircraft V12.jpg 64 Chevelle V12 Allison.jpg
 
Would the 73-77 Monte carlo and grand prix be good candidates for the the v-12's since they have a "mile" of space underhood...........?
 
Scroll down to the underhood pic:

https://barnfinds.com/minty-monte-1977-chevrolet-monte-carlo-survivor/

The front of the engine has got to be at least 18" away from the radiator. And if you really look at it, it appears that the radiator could be moved further forward to create even more room, if necessary.

i'm just sayin'.

I think in that situation weight would be a huge issue. Found this after a quick Google search.

Width = 21" outside valvecover to outside valve cover.



Height = 36" from bottom of oil pan to top of carb.



Length=53" from front of mandrel pulley to rear of transmission adapter.



Weight = 1,405 lbs with 3 gallons of oil. ( We had a guy with a straight 8 Packard respond "My straight 8 with transmission was 1,750 pounds."

http://thunderv12.com/dimensions
 
Seems to me I saw an Alison powered Monte-Carlo in the 1973-77 range years ago in one of the Hot Rod magazines ?..:thinking:
 
i meant the Falconner or other lighter engines such as BWM.

But this thread has become kind of wanky, so it may be best if we all withdrew from it......
 
i get on blackandgold's case about not staying focused and jumping around and here we ourselves are going off topic......

i think the original question is legitimate.

We have NOT clearly established that the gmc v-6 is in fact a "big block."
a) Based on what, do we declare that it IS a big block?

b) If there is no gmc "small block" to compare it to, then how can it be a "big block?"

c) Did GMC refer to it as a "big block?"


2) The aluminum competition v-6 link in post #14 is actually based on the small block chevy (sbc) not big block chevy/ BBC.
 
Where do the definitions come from? What else do you call a 478 V6?
 
Well, you can get/make a chevy small block 500+ cubes, so........

My argument is that unless the manufacture calls it a "big block" OR has a smaller similar engine to compare it to, we don't have any basis to take it upon ourselves to call it a "big block."


Example: Pontiac 287 all the way up to 455. All same engine.

But i'm open to other legitimate reasons why we should.

The exterior dimensions of the gmc v-6 are not huge, but it is heavy.
 
My understanding of small block vs big block is not so much the displacement. But the physical size and weight of the engine.
 

Latest Posts

Top Bottom