CK5
Register an account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members.

Why turn shiny brake rotors??

The shinier the rotor, the flatter the surface. The flatter the surface, the MORE surface the pad will touch. The MORE surface the pad will touch, the better the stopping. Hmmm...... I know it may be hard to believe, but the times have changed, and running a sanding disk over the rotor after you cut it may, in fact, do more harm than good. It is opposite of what you think. I am in THE business of cars, and have been to a fair share of manufacturer's seminars and training crappola. The old fashioned way is to cut the rotor and make it as rough as possible so the pad seats. The new way is to actually check all the specs on the rotor and only cut it when it is called for. This point may be, in fact, very pointless due to the fact that a K5 is an old fashioned type of truck BUT all the brake shops and dealers all follow the rule of "don't cut 'less you have to". I am probably not helping at all, and am just throwing more gas on the fire. This is very much a point of conflict between alot of people and will most likely not get resolved in this type of forum. Try it - and if the brakes feel like crap - then go get 'em turned. I put 3 sets of pads on my K5 and never turned the rotors. You just have to let them break in for a bit. Just don't go towing a trailer or drive down any big hills for a day or two :D
 
Lets put it this way, if you're doing a brake job wouldn't you do EVERYTHING that pertained to a brake job? Kinda like changing your oil, i suppose you could change your oil without changing the filter but do you? I highly doubt that anyone in their right mind changes their oil without changing the filter so why install new brake pads or shoes without machining the drums or rotors? :screwy:
 
Internet strippers are qualified to evaluate your "tactics"? Quit sidetracking my thread. Now lets see what your book says. I dont think a rotor needs to be turned, or even scuffed to provide proper braking after a pad change. Looks like the bendix site supports my claim. The rotors I gave up were mirror smooth. I wonder in GM turns the rotors on brand new production after they have assembled them to the hubs and installed the bearings to insure the rotor runs true to the hub centerline? I would think that the tolerances during the machining of the hubs and the rotor mating surfaces would be pretty damn tight, as well as the machining of the rotors themselves. I donno. But, when I installed my power stop drilled rotors, I just removed the old rotor from the hub, put on the new one, installed it on the K5. No pulsating or any adverse effects. Maybe I just got lucky?


edit: bubba, you posted while I was typing, so I see what your book says. Do you have your drums/rotors turned every time you change the pads?
 
I have done that too. And yes my truck has 230K on it an still runs fine. Clean as a whistle when I dropped the pan to check out the bottom end - which was also fine...............still.
 
of course its common practice in a shop. That is so the customer can come back in 12 months. Needing a 300 dollar brake job because their rotor is too "thin" to machine again.


and your quote says "common practice" doesn't mean it is necessary. And those 1000 page books sum up all the automotive topics in one book, instead of having several books that only deal with one subject per book.


another site
http://www.indiacar.com/index2.asp?pagename=http://www.indiacar.com/techqa/7.htm
 
And to point out one thing. That book is 6 years old. This business has changed A LOT in the past 6 years.
 
4X4HIGH said:
Lets put it this way, if you're doing a brake job wouldn't you do EVERYTHING that pertained to a brake job? Kinda like changing your oil, i suppose you could change your oil without changing the filter but do you? I highly doubt that anyone in their right mind changes their oil without changing the filter so why install new brake pads or shoes without machining the drums or rotors? :screwy:

the normal procedure, is to mic the rotor for thinness and parallelism. Then using a dial indicator to check runout. If any of those are out of spec, then the rotor is qualified for machining (except if the rotor is too thin)

with flywheels. that is something everyone suggests machining is required.
 
Fierospeeder said:
the normal procedure, is to mic the rotor for thinness and parallelism. Then using a dial indicator to check runout. If any of those are out of spec, then the rotor is qualified for machining (except if the rotor is too thin)

with flywheels. that is something everyone suggests machining is required.

I do this for a living 6 days a week for the last 18 years. There is nothing different between a flywheel and a brake drum or rotor. They all are being machined for the same reason, to get rid of any glazing, and to be made parallel. Some flywheels have more than one surface that needs to be made parallel as well as to maintain a given distance between the two surfaces.

You can beat this subject to death and you will get different beliefs from different people. The biggest thing here to realize is that no matter how you do your "brake job" it needs to be SAFE and if you're satisfied with not machining your drums or rotors and it stops without pulsation then that's what matters.
 
mofugly13 said:
edit: bubba, you posted while I was typing, so I see what your book says. Do you have your drums/rotors turned every time you change the pads?

You've been around here long enough to know that very popular rule of "Any thread may be hijacked at any time for any reason." Words to live by. :D

Seriously though, I've had to turn a set of rotors new out of the box before. I've also thrown on a new set of rotors and pads without any prep and got that ever so loving howl out of them.

My old rotors (getting ready to disc the back) will at the very minimum get cross hatched. The last brake job I need to my truck (1999), I failed to do this at the time of the brake job and ended up with a howl in the rotors, so I had to rip the tires back off and cross hatch the rotors to get rid of it.

Not only does the procedures make sense, but this new thing everyone is posting about it not being done just sounds like a ripoff to the customer. In the end, we have two opinions, one that some of us know is right and one that the other says (I don't agree, but yet I do not know for fact so don't get all pissy about wording) is right. There may be no wrong answer here, but as long as I know that my way works, it's valid advice that you have to consider along with the opposing side. Just like guns and beer.................... :D
 
I agree that a customer is getting ripped off if they dont get their rotors turned when they need it, but I'm willing to bet that VERY few of us here on CK5 pay someone to do their brakes. I have never had any problems with not turning the rotors on any vehicle that I have done the brakes on. Maybe I've just been lucky. I don't feel it's necessary if its not warped, running out of true, or grooved. But, if you want to pay a shop to turn your rotors every time, then by all means... Now 4x4high, you work in an automotive machine shop, so lucky you, I'm sure you get to do it yourself for free. I own an engine lathe, but the swing is 1" too small to do my rotors. I ain't paying every time. If I run into problems after a brake job, i'll get them turned. I don't think there's a safety issue either, please smeone correct me if I'm wrong. How many of you who have done rear disk swaps had your rotors turned before you put them in the axle? A good discussion, thanks,fellas. And thank you, Bubba, for the new sig.
 
RustyMule said:
The shinier the rotor, the flatter the surface. The flatter the surface, the MORE surface the pad will touch. The MORE surface the pad will touch, the better the stopping. Hmmm...... I know it may be hard to believe, but the times have changed, and running a sanding disk over the rotor after you cut it may, in fact, do more harm than good. It is opposite of what you think. I am in THE business of cars, and have been to a fair share of manufacturer's seminars and training crappola. The old fashioned way is to cut the rotor and make it as rough as possible so the pad seats. The new way is to actually check all the specs on the rotor and only cut it when it is called for. This point may be, in fact, very pointless due to the fact that a K5 is an old fashioned type of truck BUT all the brake shops and dealers all follow the rule of "don't cut 'less you have to". I am probably not helping at all, and am just throwing more gas on the fire. This is very much a point of conflict between alot of people and will most likely not get resolved in this type of forum. Try it - and if the brakes feel like crap - then go get 'em turned. I put 3 sets of pads on my K5 and never turned the rotors. You just have to let them break in for a bit. Just don't go towing a trailer or drive down any big hills for a day or two :D

There is morew involved than surface area - you need friction in this case to slow things down. A smooth surface does not offer as much friction - go pick up a physics textbook and look up static and kinetic friction.
 
Now 4x4high, you work in an automotive machine shop, so lucky you, I'm sure you get to do it yourself for free. I own an engine lathe, but the swing is 1" too small to do my rotors. I ain't paying every time.

To know me is to love me. :rotfl:

The next time you do brakes if you wish to bring the rotors to me i will machine them for you FREE of charge. Ask just about any of the local guys here how much they've paid to have their rotors machined by me. :thumb:

All the locals guys here understand my agreement, i love to eat, so lunch or dinner is usually on them for my services. :waytogo:
 
heres my take on the whole turning thing. first of all, i think the rotors should be scuffed up "if" they are glazed. some pads glaze rotors easier, some driver are harder and the brakes. i always scuff my rotors anyway. even if they dont seem glazed. i think it aids in bedding as well.

i used to get my rotors turned every time. but seems like there was always a groove in them so they'd grind em down to just aboce min. thickness. then they would warp really easy. so guess what, time for new rotors and pads. would have been better off leaving the little groove and scuffing off the glaze.

now when i do a brake job, i pull the disks, scuff em up and throw new pads on. if i have any kind of shimmy when i brake from warpage or hot spots, i just replace them, not worth turning.rotors are cheap, even premium ones. the thinner the disk the easier it will warp. if its already warped once, itll warp again that much easier.
this is by no means fact, just my personal experiences and opinions.
 
RustyMule said:
The shinier the rotor, the flatter the surface. The flatter the surface, the MORE surface the pad will touch. The MORE surface the pad will touch, the better the stopping. Hmmm...... I know it may be hard to believe, but the times have changed, and running a sanding disk over the rotor after you cut it may, in fact, do more harm than good. It is opposite of what you think. I am in THE business of cars, and have been to a fair share of manufacturer's seminars and training crappola. The old fashioned way is to cut the rotor and make it as rough as possible so the pad seats. The new way is to actually check all the specs on the rotor and only cut it when it is called for. This point may be, in fact, very pointless due to the fact that a K5 is an old fashioned type of truck BUT all the brake shops and dealers all follow the rule of "don't cut 'less you have to". I am probably not helping at all, and am just throwing more gas on the fire. This is very much a point of conflict between alot of people and will most likely not get resolved in this type of forum. Try it - and if the brakes feel like crap - then go get 'em turned. I put 3 sets of pads on my K5 and never turned the rotors. You just have to let them break in for a bit. Just don't go towing a trailer or drive down any big hills for a day or two :D

you kind of contradicted yourself here.

when you cut the rotors on a brake lathe. The surface becomes rough. The sandpaper creates a smoother finish. That is why it is always necessary to provide a finish after maching.


other topic
flywheels are like rotors in principle. both can be cut on a brake lathe.
flywheels sees different conditions then rotors. And a lot of the manufac of flywheels and clutches suggest grinding/cutting to eliminate comebacks.
 
Right on, bro! I take it the rotors need to be attached to the hubs they'll be mounted on to get them turned properly to the centerline of the hub. I have some 8 lug rotors I'll be using for a rear disk swap sometime in the future, but the problem is, I'll be using them on the D70 hubs that are attached to the drums I'm currently running on the rear right now. Anyway, I'll be paying you a vist as soon as my tax returns come back, as you know. I'll be glad to spring for lunch, 7-11 nachos sound good, maybe a small slurpee to help wash it down?:D
 
I'll be glad to spring for lunch, 7-11 nachos sound good, maybe a small slurpee to help wash it down?:D

That's some funny sh*t. :rotfl:

Yes, the rotors need to be attached to the hubs you are going to use. If you don't have a press just bring the hubs with the drums still attached and we can press them apart and back together at my shop. :thumb:

Also make sure the bearing races are installed still as that is where i need to mount from when i machine them.
 
Ha! Yeah, the races will be installed, cause the hubs and drums will be installed to the axle which is installed to the blazer which I will , hopefully, be driving out your way. If I dont have it together by then, Ill pull the hub/drum assy. and my GF will bring me over in her jeep.
 
beater_k20 said:
glazing. pretty much, with an old rotor you have a smooth slippery surface, and a freshly turned rotor has a smooth but rough finish. allows the pads to grab better.

And more importantly, allows the new friction material to break in properly. Like piston rings or any other machined surface, brake pads must break in.

Fierospeeder said:
you dont need to cut the rotors if they are within specs. It just needs to be scuffed up a bit with a scotch or sandpaper pad. Same rules apply after cutting the rotors.

That may be the case, but have you ever put a dial indicator on a used rotor? Usually the spec is about .003" runout is unacceptable. I've NEVER seen a rotor that was used, that wasn't out of spec from too much runout. Even grandma mobiles do not have totally straight rotors every time.

4X4HIGH said:
A brake rotor or brake drum should be machined EVERY time the brake pads or shoes are replaced. There are a couple reasons for it, first is to get rid of the glaze (shine), second is to make sure they are true without any runout, and third is to make sure both sides are paralell to one another.

Agreed, with one exception. New rotors should not be turned unless they're pressed on and off a hub. New rotors have a much better surface finish than can be made on most brake lathes, and this should not be interrupted if at all possible. I'd still check them for runout though if possible.

One other point I'm going to make is that new rotors must be washed THROUGHLY, especially if machined. Those tiny bits of metal you didn't think about get into everything, including your wheel bearings and brake friction material. This includes new rotors, they're coated with cosmoline for the boat ride from China and if not washed properly, the oil will contaminate the friction material.

They ALWAYS must be machined if they are removed from the hub and then reattached to either the same hub or a different hub because now they need to be made true to the new center, (which is the bearing races in the hub to which the rotor is attached).

Not only is this true, but the surfaces where the rotor meets the hub should also be cleaned up. All it takes is a tiny spec of rust to create runout in the assembly, which is a foundation for later problems.

Furthermore, make sure that they're using the correct cones to center your drum/rotor. Some shops I've worked in use the hub's outer surface to chuck up the assembly. This, IMO, is unacceptable. The drum/rotor should only be attached on the brake lathe utilizing the surfaces that the vehicle itself holds the rotor on the vehicle with, in our case, this is the wheel bearing race for full floating axles and in a rear semi floater, the center of the drum. This is just as critical as any of the other steps in the process because if the drum/rotor is not properly centered on the machine, you're going to machine runout into the assembly instead of removing it.

Every time I have ever replaced a drum or rotor on one of these vehicles, I've insisted on turning the assembly. The shop I previously worked in didn't do this (because their brake lathe was a piece of crap, it created more runout than it solved) but that doesn't make the practice acceptable.

If you never machine your rotors or drums when you change pads or shoes the only thing you accomplish is a pedal that doesn't go as far to the floor, you will not increase the stopping power one single bit since the rotors or drums have a glazed surface which will glaze the pads or shoes as well.

True. Sadly, even Mercades Benz does not turn rotors when you take your vehicle in for service. The replace pads only unless the rotors are badly damaged, and in that case they get thrown away and new ones installed.

Just because you guys have seen/heard of hack job brake jobs doesn't mean that nobody does it professionally anymore.

I'd also like to add--when you take your brake rotors in to be turned, ask to see their brake lathe. If it looks like hell, is dirty, never cleaned, etc., run away fast! If bushings/bearings are not replace regularly, and the machine is not kept clean, they'll likely produce a worse finish when done than the rotors/drums before you brought them in.

I hope I didn't write a novel on this but if you can't tell I've done this for a living as well. Honestly, most parts stores do not have the proper equipment to do this process correctly, and unless you're replacing rotors/drums, take them to a machine shop that does engines as well. Hopefully that means that you'll get an employee that understands how critical the small details of this process are.

In some shops I've worked, nobody even knew how to read a mic to check the rotors. 90% of the rotors from today's cars are going to be garbage. 60k+ miles on a set of ceramic brake pads will wear rotors quicker than the pads need to be changed--the pads literally outlast the rotors in most cases.

All of these things drive up the cost of a brake job, but its YOUR LIFE, and I don't take chances with any of it. Remember--when your car was new, someone took care of fine details such as this. When you repair your car, the object is to make it good as new. The fine details are the difference between a professional brake job and simply replacing friction.
 
That may be the case, but have you ever put a dial indicator on a used rotor? Usually the spec is about .003" runout is unacceptable. I've NEVER seen a rotor that was used, that wasn't out of spec from too much runout. Even grandma mobiles do not have totally straight rotors every time.

i had rotors that were within spec. Putting a dial indicator and mic"ing" the rotors is cheaper for the customer from unnecessary costs.
 
Fierospeeder said:
i had rotors that were within spec. Putting a dial indicator and mic"ing" the rotors is cheaper for the customer from unnecessary costs.

If that's the case, break the glaze and run them.

Really rare I'd bet.

Even if runout and thickness are acceptable, typically the surface finish is not.
 
Top Bottom