Agreed, I think low MPG isn't practical in these trucks. If that is the only consideration, a 6.2L diesel might get the best results. Just don't be in a hurry to get anywhere.![]()
100% agree

Agreed, I think low MPG isn't practical in these trucks. If that is the only consideration, a 6.2L diesel might get the best results. Just don't be in a hurry to get anywhere.![]()

I just swapped in the higher pressure ACDelco pumps, can't remember the part number now but it would be factory on a 97 Tahoe. Th.
It'll hit 90psi if you have a kinked return line.The pump is an EP381 pump...same one I used. Was for a 97 Tahoe that fits inside a TBI tank hanger (same dimensions of a TBI pump) but puts out the necessary ~60 psi needed for LS or aftermarket EFI

It'll hit 90psi if you have a kinked return line.![]()
Honestly, with your 8" lifted on 37's 3+3 with a SM465, even if you put a 5.3 in this thing, the mpg's are never going to be that great. So I think looking 5.3 for this thing would be worthless (IMO obviously). So really if still wanting LS, then 6.0 should be the real choice, but again looking at MPG's, the 6.0's don't do good on gas at all. Both my brothers have 6.0 trucks (one is a 2000 burb, but that 6.0 has Z06 cam, head work, intake, exhaust, and a tune. the other brother has a bone stock 2004 6.0 3/4 ton truck) both don't get any better than 13 hwy set at cruise...and realistically it's around 11 daily driven.
My point by all that is trying to get more mpg's for what this truck is will be a rabbit chase that you probably won't win. So really, what are the plans for the truck? What are the overall uses you want out of it. Do you just want an extra truck to have around to use? Or do you want to tow with it?
If you really want to go through the whole process of swapping a motor into this truck, I would consider an 8.1. Will bolt into the truck much easier than other LS's, has the low end grunt to push this big truck around really well, and will probably get around 10 mpg's doing it (comparable to 6.0 but lots more power in stock form). However, it's going to add up with all the misc stuff that goes into a motor swap (cooling, fueling, wiring, exhaust, crossmemeber, etc.).
If it were me with this truck, I would just pull the 454 and do a simple rebuild on it, maybe throw a cam at it (and maybe heads if the budget allows) and slap it back in with a carb on it to get it back running. Then save up for FItech or Sniper system and do it all at once. If my crew cab originally came with a 454, that's what I would have done, but mine came with a clapped out TBI350 that had low compression and didn't want to run. And since I wanted to tow with mine, and was going to do a motor swap anyways, I went with 8.1
My 2¢.
On the drive to Blazer Bash I got just a shade over 11mpg with the 454 and Holley Sniper. I have 37's, 5.13 gears, and OD. That is pulling 10000ft passes over I70 too, so I think that's a good solid MPG.
I weighed my crew cab while it still had the 350 and it was 7700lbs. That was on a certified Cat scale that guarantee their weights. I was shocked it was over 7000. I was guessing it would be around 6500. I'm going to weigh it again after I put the 4L80e in because it definitely weighs more than the 700r4. Not to mention the weight of the Magnum and NP205. I'm betting the addition of those 2 plus the 454 is going to put me at 8000lbs.
I have a 2008 2500HD company pickup with a 6.0L and the 6spd auto, 6L80 or 6L90 I think. I have mostly a highway commute and the best mileage I could ever baby out of it was 14.5mpg. That truck weighs about 7200lbs according to the scales at the salvage yard.
My saddle tanks are factory "baffled" because it came with TBI on the 350. I just swapped in the higher pressure ACDelco pumps, can't remember the part number now but it would be factory on a 97 Tahoe. The baffling doesn't do much under 1/2 tank on severe angles. For street driving I don't notice a problem until I get under 1/4 tank. IMO, the saddle tanks a much less forgiving for fuel slosh due to their shape. I feel like the K5/Burb tanks are less finicky based on the experience I've had with them.
Coming from a TBI system made the accessory costs of installing the Sniper a little cheaper. I only needed 2 pumps and the fittings to adapt the steel lines to -6AN. If you are comparing LS to aftermarket EFI, any fuel system requirements are going to be the same for either one so you could consider those a wash.
You can do the aftermarket EFI and hold off on the timing control for however long you'd like to spread out the costs. I sprung for the more expensive Holley Dual Sync distributor for timing control with the Sniper because I knew they would work well together and product support would be no concern. If you are looking to keep costs down, @Bent77 figured out a TBI distributor will work with aftermarket EFI. You can get a decent all new TBI distributor for a little over $100.
I think it's likely you could do the aftermarket EFI cheaper. I think if you decided a year later, that the EFI'd 454 still wasn't cutting it you could do an LS swap and get 75% of your investment in the EFI system back. Your fuel system would already be setup for the LS setup.
The other thing that appealed to me with the Sniper is that it will support up to 600HP. So you could also pull the 454, rebuild/hop it up, and stick it back in with the EFI all ready to go.
On the highway 5mpg is a common number and the truck doesnt like 75mph. I drive it a few days a week around town and to work here and there. I have 4 other trucks and a car, so this is just something I drive for pleasure. The long term goal is driver quality repaint, some modern convenience, and a 24v or CR Cummins with a 6 speed for a daily driver. But I think thats at least 5 years off and I'd just like to make it more enjoyable and reliable for short to medium trips now. Maybe even haul the RZR around with it a bit. 10MPG would be nice. Drivability and reliability would be the goal. I do not care for the 8.1, it is not on my list of considerations. Two of my good friends have them, abysmal mpg and not much better running than my 6.0 unloaded. Loaded would be a different story, but I have a diesel tow rig for anything heavy.
Freshening up the big block has been tossed around, and honestly it isnt as tired as I say it is. It does have a mild cam, headers, and an intake. A new carb wouldnt hurt it, but it runs decent as is. I've been talking with a few of my coworkers and they're pushing in the EFI direction over the LS swap and they're starting to sway me. It is much easier to run what you already have.
Of course I'm bias, the LQ4 in my SAS truck has given me over 30k miles of trouble free use on a big tire with a lot of abuse. It's taken me out of state, 11 hour round trip. I've used it for a daily driver. Its taken me 3 hours at 80mph with a quad in the bed, wheeled in the dunes all weekend, and came home with zero trouble. With 184k on the clock I'd drive it anywhere. The 100k mile LS6 in my DD sees at 6k between shifts several times a day without a single complaint. I just turn the key and go.
I'm not sure the old big block could ever be so trouble free, and that's my only hang up with keeping the BBC. Really, the EFI swap isnt the issue. From what I read it seems great. Frankly, I want the old truck with minimal electronics with modern efi reliability. I'm tired of always having to tweak the carb or seal a leak or worry about spinning it 2600rpm on the way to work.
Just keep the 454 and do aftermarket EFI on it...from the sounds of it, it will probably suit your immediate needs just fine. At least until you want to do the cummins swap
And just as a side note, I've heard everything under the sun by now of why people hate on the 8.1. 9 times out of 10 I've found it's because the user has unrealistic expectations out of what the motor will give them in stock form (especially in regards to mpg's). It's almost become laughable to me at this point. To each their own I guess
Cold weather operation and maintenance costs are also a win with a gasser.