CK5
Register an account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members.

One Piece at a Time: My 1985 Diesel Suburban

I run 4” on 37’s with basically just the front fangs and a minor trim on the back. I’d go 2” but I run the ORD crossover steering and 4” is as low as you can go with that.
2” could fit 37s but you need 4 for crossover and steering 37s with push pull might not make the greatest wheeler
I'm on 2" front Tuff Country springs with ORD crossover and 37s. When I was buying parts from ORD they just told me crossover at 2" requires the high clearance engine cross member. So that's what I did. Been working great for 6 years now.
 
"Hmmm, I thought I hated this color, but unfaded, it's not bad!"
Yeah, it is a fun reminder of what it looked like when I was 5, and as it turns out, probably a useful reference for paint selection.

What color of blue is it?
I think GM called it midnight blue, so the darker one.

I think I know what’s going on but I’m going to play dumb.
Just high lining and paint.

Cage building?
Unlikely. I’ve retired it from heavy trails, and want to keep it in its original-ish shape (-ish is doing a lot of heavy lifting in this sentence), so no need for a cage. The waggy gets the nod for cage-worthy escapades.

David
 
And back to the truck in this build thread.

@AgDieseler I believe that I saw in your IG post that you limited the rear suspension travel. I wanted to ask if you just used limit straps on the shocks, or how did you do that?
 
you limited the rear suspension travel. I wanted to ask if you just used limit straps on the shocks, or how did you do that?
I set a limiter for how far the shackle is allowed to fall. It's just a piece of strap across the shackle mount, and seems to have worked just fine with several full extensions, though I confess I will add limit straps that run from the frame to the top of the axle tube.

E745D11D-7963-400C-8F20-A4BB4882ABD4.jpeg

David
 
People will shit.
Some will not like it. Most casual viewers won't notice. Folks like us will dig into the build details and some will think it's cool. Whatever the mix, it'll get eyeballs.

The suburban has never stopped evolving, so a 2500HD chassis and powertrain with as many ORD goodies as I can cram in it sounds pretty good to me. For our squares, chassis swaps are only going to get more popular. Currently, it's a high end shop thing, mostly, but the trickle down effect is pretty real, so I'm not plowing any new earth here. I envision a swap that has ~10" of travel while sitting several inches lower than the current setup and have a workable track width. It'll still have 39s or 40s since the fenders will be cleared for it.

This is all a couple of years away.

First, the truck has to be made SEMA-worthy. It'll sit in Seymour's booth in '25 and we'll make a bunch of content around it for about a year. While the charger spends a year in paint jail, I'll rob parts from the suburban to build the wagoneer into a legit trail truck. Then, the suburban and a yet-to-be-purchased LB7 or LLY or LM-whatever duramax and its chassis will get married. In Texas, I can delete everything and continue to register it as an 85.

A Triton Eng front end would be amazing.
I can only imagine the effort to scab that onto my suburban frame, and the side eye Igor would give me for doing it.

I call dibs on the current front axle
It's probably going on the jeep
Hey, the only way to fix that wagoneer is to make it into a chevy.

David
 
One of my dream builds was to put a square burb on an AWD 08 Denali frame, and lower it.
Beef the engine, and add a very subtle but there wide body.

AWD canyon carving pro touring square burb:saweet:

That's almost be the way to start that, is start with a newer 2500hd frame and build off of that for your suspension and graft your body on.
 
Some will not like it. Most casual viewers won't notice. Folks like us will dig into the build details and some will think it's cool. Whatever the mix, it'll get eyeballs.

The suburban has never stopped evolving, so a 2500HD chassis and powertrain with as many ORD goodies as I can cram in it sounds pretty good to me. For our squares, chassis swaps are only going to get more popular. Currently, it's a high end shop thing, mostly, but the trickle down effect is pretty real, so I'm not plowing any new earth here. I envision a swap that has ~10" of travel while sitting several inches lower than the current setup and have a workable track width. It'll still have 39s or 40s since the fenders will be cleared for it.

This is all a couple of years away.

First, the truck has to be made SEMA-worthy. It'll sit in Seymour's booth in '25 and we'll make a bunch of content around it for about a year. While the charger spends a year in paint jail, I'll rob parts from the suburban to build the wagoneer into a legit trail truck. Then, the suburban and a yet-to-be-purchased LB7 or LLY or LM-whatever duramax and its chassis will get married. In Texas, I can delete everything and continue to register it as an 85.


I can only imagine the effort to scab that onto my suburban frame, and the side eye Igor would give me for doing it.



Hey, the only way to fix that wagoneer is to make it into a chevy.

David
That's what I did with my wagoneer. All chevy.
As for IFS, I am with you.
I am enjoying my stock 2500 suburban right now.
I am working on marrying a chevy van with a 2003 avalanche frame to 4wd it.
At some point I want to have one of my square Suburbans on a modified, longer travel IFS, and maybe IRS too
 
I so want to pick your brain on the ifs setup, I have envisioned a ttb front end square for years. The desert racer in me has always wanted a low COG.
 

Latest Posts

Top Bottom