CK5
Register an account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members.

The Willomet Charger

A desecration to Mopar nuts everywhere, this is my protouring, LS-powered, 1970 Dodge Charger; built at my shop, Willomet Motor & Fabrication.
I haven't read the rules but you're going to be drag racing this right? Is a halo bar going to be required?
The drags aren't my main focus. A Z28 Camaro does 12.3 on street tires, so that's kind of my target. Hoosiers might bring that into the 11s, an ET that I don't think requires a full cage.

This car is supposed to be more of an all arounder; a replacement for my CTS-V that I let go of a couple of years ago. It left a hole in my heart.

David
 
Last edited:
Wasn't sure what you were shooting for. Whatever you're planning on with it, just be sure you build it so it meets sanctioning body requirements. Would suck to decide later you need to rework stuff. Esp w/ the attention to detail you put into things.
 
Bingo brother.

I've been out of the game for awhile but I would say your plans are definitely on the right track. A front halo and a-pillar down bars are mostly for crash protection and if memory serves only adds a minimal amount of torsional rigidity, more so if a dash cross bar is used.

So maybe I missed it but tubular k-member or no?
 
That g machine chassis of Alston is exactly what I had in the back of my head, he's been doing high level handling stuff since the mid 90's.
You don't need a NASCAR chassis to make it stiff, plus I really hate to see cages in street cars personally.

Overbuilt is better than underbuilt however. My last car I used double the size and thickness of attachment plates on the 6 pt cage, some really serious subframe connectors that tied together, and it was just perfect for the power level and tire size. Put it this way, only car I've driven that handled better is my friends Lotus series 60
 
I've done several cages in cars. All of them handling cars. Think time attack type stuff.

I would strive to do a halo of sorts with down bars. 2 ways to do this. One make the cage a feature. Make it the trim. It's hard to do right. Other way is to do the cage so you can fit trim in under and around and then have the cage upholstered or painted to match or even a fancy custom headliner to hide it all.

Neither is easy to do.

Going with these guys and watching the flex it's amazing what a cage will do. And this is on modern cars.

But remember this is on cars on the ragged edge. These were guys in a Ford focus or a old 240sx or even older GTIs kicking ass on some high end factory cars.
 
A rigid unibody car like a hatch even an older one is crazy stiff compared to a body frame car.. heck my 89 3 series can be jacked up on one corner and the doors still open, Barely but still will work, my VW doesn't even creak.. it's stupid stuff.. that all translates to me.. I like the stiffness so I can see where you go with this..
what about the modulus of strength strictly looking at the chassis beams from a size perspective because a box is more rigid in both directions than a rectangle. 3x3 vs 2x4 for example..
 
Shoot older GTIs always lifted the driver rear tire under hard cornering but it never upset the car. That's a pretty stiff car and a cage helped improve its handling. My buddy picked up almost a full second on a 65 second lap with no other mods. We added weight and picked up time.
 
They still do the little leg lift, some auto x guys run no front sway bar to allow it to rotate.. crap my tdi was an excellent handling car.. 1 second off my buddies s2k on a small go cart track. Less than min laptimez..
 
A bit of derail but it does relate. It's a good time to watch a bunch of highly modded hot hatches go out on a track. With several awesome exotics. Then watch those exotics get outbraked and out cornered everywhere.

But it's definitely more fun to see a huge muscle car doing the same thing!
 
So maybe I missed it but tubular k-member or no?
I'm 98% settled on using the Magnum Force transformer K member and front suspension - all boxed construction, loads more rigidity than the factory stamped stuff. It's their pro-touring setup, as their tubular stuff is more geared toward drag racing.

I spent a lot of time talking with the guys at Rad Rides about this suspension compared to Art-Morrison (C6 stuff), RMS (MII stuff), RS (C6 or MII depending on setup), XV (C6), and a tuned up torsion bar setup from Firm Feel. They've used them all, but have had the best long term performance for strip and street cars using the below. That's experience I'm glad to lean on.

magnumforce_transformer_mopar_suspension.png

You don't need a NASCAR chassis to make it stiff, plus I really hate to see cages in street cars personally.
Same page. I have my mind right about a b-pillar halo bar, but the front firewall is a great canvas for a reinforced shear plate connected to the larger rocker boxes which is connected to door bars. I'm headed down that path for now in the aim of avoiding an a-pillar halo and down bars. We're going for Z28 and CTS-V levels of performance.
...make the cage a feature. Make it the trim. It's hard to do right...
This is my thinking. I'm not hung up on an original interior, and an aesthetically integrated cage is appealing - a la the Singer 911. It just might not be wrapped in Ferrari leather...
Singer-Porsche-911-Virginia-14.jpg

...what about the modulus of strength strictly looking at the chassis beams from a size perspective because a box is more rigid in both directions than a rectangle. 3x3 vs 2x4 for example..
Totally agree. I did a quick measurement of the rockers at The Roadster Shop, and they are slightly wider than an iPhone 6 is tall, so ballpark 6" square tubing. The inner rail structure (reference my prior sketch) would use a 2x3 set vertical, and follow the Art-Morrison chassis lines.

We're just a few weeks away from contractors being done, and I'm itching to get back working in the shop.

David
 
Spent the morning refining my quick sketch. Not to scale, but you can see where it's going. Hatched areas are existing "frame" structure.
IMG_8273.JPG

David
 
Is there no room to cross brace the area towards the lower part of the drawing?
The fuel tank goes in the lowest void, and cross braces are really just floor support. Forward of that will have some bracing related to the suspension links and shock mounts. I'm just not entirely sure what that looks like, yet. The 6 point cage will likely handle most of the "stiffness duties" rearward of the link mounts.

David
 
Top Bottom