Either way you need a 241 and a 205.
Either way you need drive shafts made or modded.
Either way you need a one off crossmember(s) to match your chassis.
Either way you need custom shifters.
Eco box way saves length, has more exhaust routing options, simplifies crossmember design, should be stronger overall.
241+ divorced 205 saves cost of eco box, allows (potentially) for equal length driveshafts. Seems like it would be harder to set up, but easier to fix later. Requires a 3rd shaft between the 2 cases.
This is the exact kind of info/opinions I was hoping for. Another thing I thought of is the extra money spent on the middle shaft would offset the Ecobox purchase a couple hundred.
So end goal is the question. I'm not necessarily convinced one way is cheaper, or better. I would think that the 3rd shaft of the divorced setup would be weaker than a married arrangement. Sending low range power through ujoints into another gear reduction unit seems like that would be the obvious fail point. Maybe having the ujoints there would act as a fuse. Maybe a good thing.
This part and the additional cost of the 3rd shaft has me leaning towards the Ecobox.

) probably wouldnt really work out in reality, but just thinking outside the box.