Beautifully done David.
-G
-G


I did skip the shock mounts mostly for practical reasons. It’s a lot more work to cut and press brake a complicated shape like that, and for minimal gains.Why not simply plate over them if you're not using them anymore?
Would have pretty easy to cut out the dimpled shape and weld in a flat piece there to plate over it flat. No?I did skip the shock mounts mostly for practical reasons. It’s a lot more work to cut and press brake a complicated shape like that, and for minimal gains.
David
I did skip the shock mounts mostly for practical reasons. It’s a lot more work to cut and press brake a complicated shape like that, and for minimal gains.
David
When we did mine we did this and put 3/16th's plate up against it and welded the inside of the frame to the outside plate.Sorry, I meant cutting out the mount and making that section flat, as seen in the link that Brian posted. There's nothing wrong with leaving it. It just seemed, since you had to weld around it anyways, you might have welded in a flat patch instead of having to fit the plate around it. It would have a cleaner look and eliminate a stress concentration that is known to cause problems.
Or, since you have awesome overlay plates, that section of overlay could be left solid and you wouldn't even need to patch the frame behind it. Just weld it in from the back side and go!
I like daydreaming out loud...
Candidly, it didn’t enter my mind. @Deuling and I started with the notion to just go around the mount as an early design criteria, and I didn’t go back and think about it after. It’s a neat idea, and I would absolutely do it in conjunction with an overlay.I meant cutting out the mount and making that section flat
Certainly a couple of incremental hours of cutting and welding would have been reasonable, and would have allowed for another window or two.Would have pretty easy to cut out the dimpled shape and weld in a flat piece there to plate over it flat. No?
Thanks! They’re a ton of work, but I’m very pleased with the outcome. I really enjoyed working with Adam to develop these, and hope he sells the snot out of them.You knocked it out of the park, David. Everything about the overlay plates is sensible, well thought-out, and well-executed. Bravo.
So, there’s 3/8” of rod showing, and 1/2” of rubber cushion. Did you leave 1” of rod in addition to the 1/2” the cushion takes up?Looking good! 3/8” might not be enough brother. I know on mine and @Desert_K5 we just did, it’ll eat up an additional inch of shock travel from straight bump to full articulate.
I had 1” of rod showing plus the rubber cushion. I was really surprised to see how much it moved the first time.So, there’s 3/8” of rod showing, and 1/2” of rubber cushion. Did you leave 1” of rod in addition to the 1/2” the cushion takes up?
David
Good notes all around. Thank you. I still have enough in the tabs themselves to trim and get another 1/2" or so.I had 1” of rod showing plus the rubber cushion. I was really surprised to see how much it moved the first time.
Same thinking here. I intended to burn about an inch at the bottom, too, thinking that the straps might stretch over time.When we set the limit straps, I let it hang at full droop on the shocks then marked the shafts an 1-1/4” down. Raised the axle up to that 1-1/4” mark and set the straps there. The straps are 4 layer and don’t stretch too much in our application. But you still have the pivot inboard of the shock just like the bumps.
I had to part with the CV a while back, and have been running a superflex joint at the transfer case, and a standard 1350 at the 60. I plan to reclock the 205 to ease the angle, but I suspect it won't be enough.While I’m thinking about it, If you have a double cardan joint on your front shaft at the t-case it probably won’t have enough angle. I have heard the 1410 u-joint has enough working angle but for now I am running Tom woods superflex joints.