Stomis
Professional Amateur
I know I was just saving myself from copy and pasting every single line of code since theres like 15 pictures but fine.... 



Thanks, I wanna see the pics, but I am too lazy to click another link.![]()
If it were me, I'd gusset the shock mounts a little more at the bend. At least keep an eye on 'em.
Yeah, I meant the towers. The tube and C are different materials so I'd expect that to be a tough weld, but I am no welding expert either. Are those Kert's tabs on the axle?
What are you using for a drag link?
Do any road driving? If so, do the front shocks ever bottom out?


Stomis,
I always feel like a jerk for being the guy who has to comment on stuff like this, but maybe it will save you some headaches down the road.
As designed, those front shock mounts are not going to last very long....
The amount of leverage that a shock puts on the shock tower is phenomenal, and those c-channels you've built look really puny compared to something like a F*rd tower. I'm guessing that the failure point will be at the weld seam where the angle starts, but it's also possible that they will rip out of the frame... only two bolts (and both in a straight line)
Think about a stronger mounting scheme if you can, I think the current design is going to be a dissapointment after probably only a single wheeling trip.![]()


The thing that concerns me most is the angle that you've got built in to those mounts:
![]()
That bend, and the length of material from the bend to the upper shock eyelet takes all of the upward load from the shock, and applies it as leverage against your weld seam. It's sort of like having about a 6" - 7" long breaker bar working against that weld seam.....and the weight of your axle and tire/wheel is the big, dude on steroids applying the force to it.
I'm assuming that you have access to a welder and some scraps of metal since you've already done so much fabrication already. I think it would go a long way to come up with a "backbone" brace from the back side of the shock mount (where the upper shock mount bolts in) down to the top of the frame and land it on a nice thick plate with maybe a couple more holes to bolt it down. If you can re-use factory holes instead of drilling more new ones, obviously that would be ideal.
The main objective IMHO is to limit the movement of that upper angle section of the mount. They WILL flex a lot even just under normal driving... People are always surprised at how much, and how hard a mount like that can work against the frame. Anything you can do the re-inforce that angled part will help, and tying it to an adjacent part of the frame (the upper part of the "C" instead of the vertical again) will help keep the frame from tearing at those two existing bolt holes...
I think that would go a long way toward adding some necessary beef to those towers without much more effort.
![]()
If I were to brace it, I would grind the sides of the c-channel flat, and have a couple of pieces of steel cut into the shape of a wide triangle that would contour the bend facing the engine while having it cover about 4 inches of material on the top and bottom peice. Weld it up all the way around and it would cover more surface area, spread out the stress created by the leverage.
The way that the cut on it starts above the frame would make me shy away from adding bracing on the top of it. If I were to brace the top of it, I would pb cut some material off of the bottom of the bracket, move it down until that bend is flush with the frame and then add the bracing to the top of the bracket to get the most out of it. That is assuming your bumpstops leave you enough room to do so.
Other than needing a little bracing, looks good.
Remington

Glad to see you're keeping it.
Someday we'll have to go wheeling together...you have alot less work to do than me.