You guys did not disappoint!
You guys did not disappoint!It still has the clutch pedal for nostalgia sake.I just think you should put a manual transmission back in it.
Martin

If you ask me staying off the skinny pedal is not a correct option....![]()
I don't have either one of these. So links and a lot of skinny pedal are needed. Has worked for 17 years.HP doesn't move the truck, torque does, you need big torquey engine and let it work at idle.
Probably because you can’t see what your about to hit!I keep saying snow runs are the worst for vehicle carnage. In my experience.
If you ask me staying off the skinny pedal is not a correct option....![]()
I don't know where to start Issaam?I am sorry but I have to disagree.
The skinny pedal isn't the right answer.


HP doesn't move the truck, torque does, you need big torquey engine and let it work at idle.
At the time this happened I was pulling the 7000lb Savalanche thru deep snow. I had the throttle nearly pinned running 2nd gear, both lockers engaged, and in double low.
The only place you are correct is in straight line racing on sand or mud.
Well I knew that was coming.I don't know where to start Issaam?
You say you disagree and then you agree the skinny pedal isn't correct?
The skinny pedal makes HP and TQ, so I don't understand what you are trying to say....
Also, the ole' HP vs TQ debate has been going on for decades. Yes the TQ is what puts a force to the ground from the wheels, and is in the equation for acceleration, F=MA, or A=F/M. However, most people forget HP isn't measured, it's calculated, from TQ. And it involves RPM. HP essentially delivers the TQ faster, and in more combustion pulses/second for a given engine. This is the reality you will see in races, HP usually wins the time, TQ usually moves the heavy trailer.
So yes, you need TQ and gearing to move a lot of weight without bogging down. However, when it comes to acceleration, putting the TQ down faster (HP) accelerates faster in not just sand or mud, but also pretty much any other surface you time acceleration on. Sand, mud, dirt, asphalt, grass, concrete, etc.
Also, Scott said...
This spring didn't bend at idle.
The "only place" is definitely not correct, it's correct in a lot more situations than those two. Most types of acceleration, on most surfaces, straight, curved, smooth, bumpy, etc. I prefer torque in a tow vehicle, I'll choose HP in most other vehicles.
If you knew a sheet metal guy, he could build a water tight box.This is the area I'm trying to utilize.
View attachment 449038
I could put about 8qts of the various Amsoil fluids I use in that area.
Then just a vent hole on the bottom would work.Ahh, I understand, we agree on the theory, just disagree on the driving style...Well I knew that was coming.
While we do see things very similar and we understand the physics correctly, I usually prefer using the least amount of skinny as possible to accomplish the task, and usually where there is risk of failure I tend to go easy and try and get through literally on idle.
I ran my k5 turbo diesel manual with 35" tires locked fron and rear on 1/2ton axles for 6 years and never broke anything, going through rocks, mud, sand and snow.
Once I was moving on even terrain, yes I would go full throttle, but if I was tackling an obstacle or starting in a slippery medium I got moving then applied the skinny.
It's mostly because I don't like to spend too much time and money fixing my shit over and over again.
Obviously to each their own as is evident on this nationwide site.


We can fix that valve floating problem...In sand I run the skinny pedal until just before the valves float. In rocks, not so much.

Nah. Been that way for 17 years.We can fix that valve floating problem...![]()