Kert, any issue with this filler neck being on the two surfaces of the tank....I know we talked about putting the top and two sides on last. I think this could be put into the top and one of those two sides...I think it would give it more strength being on the edge of the box as well?
looked at these two sending units as well, any thoughts?
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/sww-439363-d/overview/ [/quote]
No problem putting the fill tube in the corner like that. Just need an angle mesurement.
Only real difference is the depth those two units will work with. Otherwise either one would work. The first can be modded for a much shorted depth tank.
I do like the one Ryoken linked. Looks like packaging that would be stupid simple.
Ryoken, how does that adjust?
I will get the angle of the filler neck finalized when I get the unit back in the truck, and also get the line sizes figured out for sure, right now I know I need to come out of the tank and do an immediate 90* to go to the pump, within 3", IIRC?
the senders both will work for the depth tank we have here.
As far as fitting goes, i have some Aluminum NPT bungs at the shop. I would advise to stay with AN and the same size if you can. NO, it doesn't need to be that big but I like to keep things the same size. YOu never know when you might wish you had a fitting you could rob from a vent line for temp use to get you off the trail.
good point on that, by the looks of the pump inlet, I'd say -6 is bigger than the small restriction in the pump...they seem small to support 600hp??
cuz it's boat stuff...

not the cheap option obviously, they run like 125 to 150...
http://www.livorsi.com/catalog/senders_auto.htm
we run ton's of VDO stuff in the marine biz tho...
I think that will be the choice of sender to use on a bed tank for the CC!
whew, last night was fun, but today is aweful foggy....
