B
Bent77
Guest
Unless it’s allowing less fuel to fill when warmer, more when cooler appearing to be the change in mileage
I always do that.I mean statistically if you run 100 tanks, it’ll even out to something pliably “average”

What the heck.. December?

I'm not a fan of the anti-fouler things either. My father in law had 8 on the 283 in his '64 Chevelle. I about fell over when I found them. Stupid thing still ran ok. It was lacking power for sure, but it ran.2 were bad, #3 above is the worst.
#6
View attachment 377168
#8
View attachment 377169
Cleaned up the plugs with a pick and wire brush and the idle is smooth.
The crew cab had one of those nonfouler things installed by previous owner and it actually blew out of the block. Kinda soured me on them.
This motor doesn't smoke like others I've seen with leaky valve seals. It does smoke on the second start up of the day. I also see smoke on upshift if accelerating hard.
I recently noticed some detonation on hard acceleration and I fattened up the afr, lowered acceleration timing advance, and it's gone away now.
Guess we'll be seeing about a "new" motor.
I am very disappoint the PF4 didn't prevent this.
View attachment 377170
![]()